ThaLondonDiaries

Update!!! Change Your Blogrolls!!!

2007-02-14T23:50:00.000Z

Owing to my recent decision to relocate to an area which made Tha London Diaries a misleading blog title, and also owing to my decisions with regard to how I'm going to develop my blogging, may I ask that you update your blogrolls to:

ProScrybed Thoughts - for political, sociological, media and other related discourse, and

InScrybed Lines - for literary, food, music, and other non-political stuff.

Posts on both are forthcoming. I'd say "watch this space," but that would be pointless - watch those spaces instead.

:-)

Note: This blog will feature no further posts. Thank you for reading, and I hope you continue to enjoy one or both of my new projects.

Personality Cluster

2007-02-14T17:54:00.000Z

Your Personality Cluster is Extraverted Thinking

You are:

Organized and logical - a master at puzzles
Competitive in almost any arena of life
Objective when necessary, but passionate about what you truly love
Intolerant of excuses and incompetence

What's Your Personality Cluster?

All of those statements apply to me, though there is obviusly more to the young Scrybe than merely the above. :-)

Comment of 2007

2007-02-12T16:40:00.000Z

A few of you may remember that a while back I started a 'series' on here of the best comments by bloggers on another blogger's site. Hamer Shawcross was the inaugral winner. Unfortunately, it stalled due to a lack of interesting comments unearthed by Scrybe, and Scrybe's latent inability to spend hours searching for such comments. But now, thanks to ParburyPolitica's help, it is back!

May I give you...the Best Blogger's Comment On Another Blogger's Blog of 2007......

.As for Ivory Towers. Don't play that one with me man. You're as establishment as I am. Tory Agent, candidate, A-lister, Campaign Director to the Shadow Home Secretary, BBC commentator. You're hardly Chez Guevara are you?

Tom Watson. On Iain Dale's webshite.

Update of Paul Delaire Staines

2007-02-11T14:29:00.000Z

211.17.152.64 - 211.17.152.71 (MGIFONDS) Staines,Paul Delaire; 3-4-2,Shibaura,Minato-ku,TOKYO 108-0023; JAPAN; JP

Class C Networks - Block 211.17

Thats all I'm aware of, would either Guido care to fill in the gaps?

Ahem. Interesting, eh?

Paul Delaire Staines.

2007-02-10T20:12:00.000Z

Interesting article here. I thought he was non-partisan? It seems not, if this potted history is anything to go by.

Hat tip to the other Guido for this one.....

Free Life No.37, September 2000 8
My parents sold the former family home recently and asked me,
not unreasonably, to clear out my books from their attic. I found
my copy of Karl Popper’s The Open Society and its Enemies,
from Plato to Marx, inside the cover my name was scrawled
together with the date 1980. I date my conversion to Libertarian-
ism from the day I put down that book.
I joined the Young Conservatives because they were the only
people around who were anti-Socialist or at least anti-Soviet.
This was the era of CND and I saw the key battle in terms of the
West versus Soviet expansionism. Simon Salzedo was chairman
of the local YCs and a Maggie-loving-Wet-hating typical young
Tory. He was bemused by this zealous anti-Communist in his
midst paraphrasing Popper and Hayek at cheese and wine
evenings – it would be a few years before he would lead the
charge at Oxford to dry out OUCA on a principled Libertarian
platform. He was elitist and it rubbed off on me, by the time I
got to sixth form I had revived the double barreled family name
that my father had let wither as a sixties Young Fabian. My
Anglo-Indian father obviously despaired of me hanging out with
Tory crypto-racists whom he loathed (although later he would
vote with his wallet for tax cuts and privatization giveaways).
By the time I was an undergraduate in the mid-eighties, having
joined the Federation of Conservative Students, and somehow
affecting to wear fake bow-ties and cheap suits (whilst endlessly
debating the merits of Anarcho-Capitalism versus Minimal
Statism), I had at last found a small number of like minded
souls. Marc Henri Glendenning the then national chairman of
FCS spoke a language I could understand - Thatcher on drugs.
Still it was right-wing anti-Communist, anti-Wet and mainly
reactionary. Battling in Student Unions to rename the “Mandela
Bar” the “Bruce Forsyth Bar”, arguing with CND feminists and
generally opposing the left wing campus establishment whilst in
the real world the Conservatives won elections by landslides and
the war of ideas. Only on campus were we a radical minority
and intentionally antagonistic, in fact so obnoxious that the
Conservative Party decided to close down its youth wings.
That antagonistic, sod you attitude continued after I failed to get
a degree (I was thrown out for being a right-wing pain in the
butt who was more interested in student politics than essays)
when I went to work in the various right-wing pressure groups
and think tanks that proliferated in the late eighties. The
deliberately provocative attitude still maintained – I never wore
a “Hang Mandela” badge but I hung out with people who did.
Why? What did we gain from doing so? Did we make ourselves
more popular by calling for the death of a man who was fighting
injustice by the only means available to him? Did this “shift the
parameters of debate” in our direction?
Did the over the top aggressiveness of the ultra-sound cadres
put people off the broader ideas and positive agenda of Libertar-
ianism? Clearly it galvanised our enemies against us in much the
same way that the crude jingoism of many Little Englanders puts
people off supporting a more liberal European ideal.
I am the first to admit that in the past when challenged on issues
I have been provocative – “What will Libertarianism do for the
homeless?” “Nothing”. Not a way to win friends and influence
people. I think its time for a more effective, kinder, gentler kind
of Libertarianism. Principled, but pragmatic. Selling out – no,
but better salesmanship certainly. A lot of us who came to
Libertarianism via FCS and student unions as well as battling in
the Conservative Party factions, have a take-no-prisoners
attitude that does not play out well to wider audiences. We are
unsympathetic and uncompromising, we are “Sound” but little
heard. What profiteth an idealogue if his ideology is ignored? Or
even if it is just rendered unpalatable.
Now there is a role for martyrs, who will brook no compromise.
Our editor is foremost amongst them, his voice can be heard in
the wind and on Radio 4, Radio 5, Talk Radio, Local Radio,
Daytime TV and innumerable late night discussion programmes
as well as Panorama, not counting a gross of websites, a million
e-mails and this journal. All power to his ‘puter.
Nevertheless Sean would never claim to be a politician or a
pragmatist – he is a prophet, a prophet of doom. The British live
in one of the richest and most free nations on earth, the way
Sean tells it we are about to be marked with the number of the
beast before Big Brother Blair carts us off to a New Education
Facility for a Better Britain. Sean believes that if we give them
a millimeter they will give us the kilometer.
I prefer to listen to Prodigy whilst Sean listens to Elgar but we
do both march to the same drumbeat. I prefer to focus on the
future and our successes. For instance the internet was devel-
oped by avowed Libertarians and brought to you by free
enterprise, the EU by statists and bureaucrats. We believe in
lower taxes, our opponents want your money, free enterprise
brought you the Lotus sports car, bureaucrats brought you
London Underground. What do you want?
Mere spin? It’s optimism versus pessimism. If pessimism
prevailed than we would still be sat shivering round a fire in a
cave, but an optimist went out and slaughtered a wooly mam-
moth. People want prosperity, we offer a path to prosperity,
whereas our opponents offer only reduced equality (“Ug I think
we are running out of wood”). Californian Libertarians offer an
optimistic manifesto of capitalist success for all, some British
Libertarians preach a fire and brimstone hell for all those who
don’t repent .
The glass is half full, so with liberty in our hearts let’s focus on
pragmatic politics and progress. Don’t whinge, win.
A Kinder, Gentler, Kind of Libertarianism:
Reflections on Two Decades of Libertarianism
Paul D. Staines

link for it is here: http://www.libertarian.co.uk/freelife/fl037.pdf

The esmteemed journal also has an amusing piece on Jack Straw. Enjoy!

Update: It seems this story has been picked up elsewhere.....

Barak Obama

2007-02-10T19:45:00.000Z

His group on facebook has 249,128 members. That's an awful lot of people to have to hand. The discussion board for his group has over 1000 discussions and has only been recently started. Makes me laugh to think that we're trying to use online techniques such as this in the UK, when you think of the difference in engagement.

A few obvious observations.

(i) the u.s. is rather larger than the uk so a bigger raw number of group members would be expected.

(ii) the presidential race (even one which isn't happening ntil next year) is slightly more important than, say, who is going to be the next deputy of the labour party.

(iii) having a substantial number of people in a group helps to sustain that group and increase numbers further. think about it. I post on the board of a group with 100000 members. somebody will reply. logically, the more members a group has, the stuff gets posted and the more people respond, thus creating the image of a vibrant and popular group, thus attracting more members.

Intelligent Post Alert!

2007-02-09T21:37:00.000Z

Okay, I know I don't do this often. In fact, even this post amounts to nothing more than a shameless stealing back of my comment on someone else's blog. But I was impressed by the relative smarts displayed in my comment to feel it warranted reproducing here. And I quite like the blog it is on, so you can take this as being my feeble attempt to apologise for not linking with it by (hopefully) sending some traffic its way. To understand the context of my comment you'll have to read the original post anwyay. :-P

My comment:
"although, if we want to be accurate about it, that great reformist government of 1945 were merely implementing that great liberal reformist Beveridge's ideas from 1942. and while it ought to be noted that the NHS turned out much better under Labour than it would have done under the Conservatives (and the national government during the war did attempt to implement in 1944 but failed due to BMA rejection of their proposals), it was actually more Nye Bevan's strength and persistence which resulted in the NHS as we now know it to be. the rest of the government were less averse to introducing charges on 'extra' services - this was the premis pon which Bevan later resigned from Cabinet (although other factors did, arguably, play a role).

technically, historically, it can be claimed that Clarke is not, therefore, out ofsync with the party. I still think it a bit of a dumb comment though. Even from a purely economic point of view, intrducing charges for rehab will mean less people opt for it. they will likely then experience further medical ailments which the NHS will then have to remedy. in terms of admin staff coping with readmissions and the cost of providing this care, it seems plausible to suggest that Clarke's suggestion would be economically unjustifiable. That said, I've not researched the costs sufficiently to answer on this with any certainty, this is just my observation.

why i don't post like this on my own blog baffles me."

Now, I'm gonna go back to reading a brilliant essay by Jun'ichiro Tanasaki.

Scrybe's Absence...Explained.

2007-02-09T18:52:00.000Z

You may have noticed a, um, slight decline in posting frequency on this blog of late. I am a master of understatement, I know. But I've not been slacking...well, not that much.

(a) Just prior to Christmas I traversed the country to visit my old home oop nawf where, it seems, the internet has yet to be discovered. Thus I was without posting acces.

(b) I am relocating and, thus, tha london diaries is shortly going to be a somewhat misleading title.

How to solve this apparent dilemma? I am going to have two blogs which I never post on and which no one ever reads!

I decided that I'm going to use this one to post political stuff of a slightly higher standard than pervious posts may suggest that I am capable of, while the other blog will be more, ahem, literary. Unless I change my mind. Either way, hold on to your seats, I'm back onblog!

:-)

Update: I meant to add that Tim Ireland's blogging work is astonsihing. I shall link upon my return from Tesco's. I both wish I had the technical expertise to make his kind of posts and pray that I never p!$$ him off. Same goes for Unity over at Ministry of Truth (see blogroll). 'Nuff said.

If Music be the Food of Love...

2007-02-02T14:38:00.000Z

why was Jimi Hendrix so bloody skinny?

Thatcherite Air Rage.

2006-12-21T12:36:00.000Z

Thatcher's Solicitor General has been arrested (or cautioned, or summat) for air rage.

CRE Christmas Card

2006-12-21T10:18:00.000Z

Well, I found it an amusing break from work yesterday (see earlier posts).

The Observer, has done an analysis, which I've stolen to put below.

Ho! Ho! Ho! Come all ye PC rebels

A card from Britain's race watchdog contains a hidden Christmas message for traditionalists

Jamie Doward, home affairs editor
Sunday December 10, 2006
The Observer

At first glance the Christmas card, depicting the nativity scene, appears to have been subjected to anguished doodlings by a someone who clearly fears its traditional message has no place in 21st-century multicultural Britain.
'Three wise men can't be all men' suggests one scribble. 'The snow looks hideously white' notes another. 'Sheep should look more diverse' reads another doodle. Even the Santa trailing across the sky in his sledge is not immune to a bit of politically correct revisionism. His 'Ho! Ho! Ho!' 'could be taken as offensive to women', worries one scrawl, referring to how the two-letter word is 'gangsta' speak for 'whore'.

Article continues

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But it transpires that the sender of the card, a pastiche of PC culture, is Britain's race relations watchdog, the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE). Poking fun at the PC lobby is an unusual move for an equality watchdog, especially now that its chairman, Trevor Phillips, is to become head of the super-quango that will campaign for better rights for women, the disabled, homosexuals and ethnic and religious minorities.
But it is not the first time the watchdog has taken a robust line in ignoring liberal sensibilities. Last year Phillips declared that multiculturalism was in danger of sending Britain sleepwalking to segregation.

The CRE declined to explain its reasons for deciding to send the card to contacts and supporters. 'It speaks for itself, happy Christmas,' a spokeswoman said. But it is believed that senior members of the commission feel the card is timely with the current debates raging about multiculturalism and the true meaning of Christmas.

Yesterday a Daily Mail survey found the traditional nativity now appears in only three out of every 100 cards sold in high-street stores. The news prompted accusations of 'politically correct madness' from Tory MP Philip Davies and calls from the Christian Voice group for non-religious cards to be boycotted. But Davies should not be too vociferous. This year's anodyne Christmas card from Conservative Central Office depicts snow-laden branches against a blue sky.

Meanwhile at the Daily Telegraph, an article by business commentator Jeff Randall, discussing how he throws non-traditional Christmas cards in the bin, has brought approving letters.

Even senior religious leaders are expressing concern. Last week the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, attacked people for using 'flawed' arguments about multiculturalism with the result that the crib is in danger of being 'thrown out of Christmas'.

'The aggressive secularists pervert and abuse any notion of diversity for the sake of promoting a narrow agenda,' he said. 'Meanwhile those faith communities, who have stated categorically they are not offended by Christmas, know that if Christmas falls, they will be next.'

On Friday Tony Blair entered the debate, calling for all groups in society to integrate to promote social cohesion.

Some will view the CRE's card as a humorous attempt by Phillips to goad the mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, with whom he has had many well-publicised spats over multiculturalism. Earlier this year Livingstone accused Phillips of 'pandering to the right' so much that 'soon he'll be joining the BNP'.

Given the enmity between both sides, whether the mayor will actually receive a Christmas card from the CRE this year remains opaque.

First Post From A New Job.

2006-12-21T09:48:00.000Z

So I'm keeping it ultra-short. Going for drinks tomorrow evening near/in Westminster with a Good Egg, colleague in fabianism, and friend, which I'm looking forward to.

it was a horribly cold day today - I was out at 6.30am too! I saw soemthing which looked suspiciously like snow outisde Euston station but did not investigate further. I bloody hope its not snow, anyway.

Will return to political posting later night - gonna fire off some devil's advocacy on the British identities and, specifically, something positive about Englishness (see BBC news on comments from the Welsh Ass. if you want to guess my thoughts).

Update: And its a great and joyous job to do! (note the happy bunnyness lacing this post) :-)

But my blackberry is still playing up. :-(

Blackberry help needed!

2006-12-21T00:19:00.000Z

Okay, I've just spent the last hour or so trying to make my blackberry work again. Last time, all I had to was visit the kind university computing people who set it up for me. Now, I'm struggling. I'm trying to make it receive mail. And I'm on a mac. I've done the whole officially registering my email with the blackberry people thign, and I have apparently been sent some service books and should (I thin) be able to make it work. But I can't. And the service books have not arrived.

Don't suppose there's anyone reading this with a blackberry and a mac who fancies giving me a hand, is there?

The damn cd-rom wont work on my computer, since mac's can't read .inf files.

(Where's transpero.net when you need him/her?)

Scrybe's Job-Related Happy Bunnyness Cont....

2006-12-20T21:30:00.000Z

The reason I haven't posted today is that it was my first day on my new job. Cue lots of work and commuting oop nawf (well, cventry is north from LDN, lol). In my two trips, I have sussed that the Hammersmith and City line does not function properly until at least 8am - cue frantic phone calls to new boss apologising profusely for enforced lateness as I'd missed my train from LDN). Fortunately, my bosses are delightful and didn't bollock me. :-)

Loving my job. Very pleased to be working with a great and very affable team, and there is sufficient structure to the projects I've been given to start on to make sure I am not left to do an impossible job unsupervised (unlike previous unpaid job). Also loving the bit during work when we were arranging the printing of my business cards. Yay! I get business cards! (Please bear in mind that this is my first foray into the world of business card-possessing).

I'm commuting again tomorrow, so probably wont be posting again until late, but bear with me as I'll get into a rythym and then the regular posts shall return.

I am also, of course, not going to be posting as much over the Christmas period (though I'm not going to do a Hamer Shawcross and give a "temporary farewell" post when there's a chance I may sneak in a post or two more before the new year.

Finally, I'm very much loving having been linked to by Jon Cruddas - take it he's sussed out how to do that now. ;-)

Scrybe Doing a Time Magazine Article.

2006-12-20T21:17:00.000Z

I'm just using this post to give a shout out to my readers. Having checked my stats for today, I realised this blog got a lot of traffic, especially given that I hadn't posted anything. Its always good to now you're interested, guys.

Also noting I got a lot of world wide reads, so Ima give a big shout out to the folks who read this from........

* Tha UK (always big up my place)

* Ireland (Also a major shout out to Ireland generally for the legendary beverage of Guinness)

* Sweden (I'd attempt to recall some nordic phrases to impress, but I'm likely to fail. Loving the place though - visited once and it was highly enjoyable)

* Ohio, US (gotta love Ohio - v Kerouac-esque)

* Minneapolis, US (Dylan's adolescent home, no? After Hibbing?)

* Washington DC, US (Hi George! lol)

* Redmond, Washington, US (Few old friends from Washington - must visit the place sometime, so feel free to leave sightseeing suggestions on my blog)

* Sunnyvale, Cali, US (Gotta love Cali, especially if you're a hip hop and rock head like me)

* Germany (Again, I've visited and enjoyed immensely - German Uncle, and I love the Autobahn's if you got a fast car!)

* the three readers from New York New York, US (incl. those reading from Chase Manhattan Bank) (ah, NY, the place I wanna live someday - Yankees, Shea Stadium, the hip hop haunts, just everything)

Though I'm a little concerned that someone from the Institute of Psychiatry, LDN, felt this a necessary read.

And I should apologise to the guy who googled "interested in deer hunting @hotmail.co.uk" and ended up here.

Please feel free to leave comment, yall.

Cameron gets a Good Fisking.

2006-12-19T17:43:00.000Z

Over at Freemania. Good job, mate.

Unite and lead? I'd bet on Jon. (Cruddas Conference Call)

2006-12-19T17:23:00.000Z

Last night saw Jon Cruddas’ inaugural telephone conference as deputy leadership candidate. 6pm rolled around and Labour bloggers began calling in and logging on, stating their names to the accompaniment of classical music. It was all pretty civil, with people introducing themselves and giving fellow bloggers the chance to speak and ask questions in the debating session which followed Jon outlining how he thought the campaign had been going thus far.

I’ll kick off my discussion of the conference with the caveat that all “quotes” are not word for word what Jon said but, rather, taken from my rough notes. I do feel a little wrong about publishing this, because of that, without having it checked first. But Jon is a member of the blogging community so I’m sure either he or one of his team can drop by and correct me/develop their arguments more/request that I remove said quotes, should they feel them to be inaccurate. (Scrybe nervously awaits an angry bellowing from Jon).

Jon was, as usual*, very down-to-earth and relaxed, as well as being pretty frank in discussing the issues which came up – unusual for a politician. There is, I think, something about him which allows you to take what he says at face value and trust him. He began by talking about the campaign, and about blogging in particular, saying that he is “interested in the whole phenomena [of blogging] but wary of the language used,” recounting a tale (published) about Tony Blair allegedly trying to sound cool and it failing (circa 1997). He also thought that there is “really effective, lateral, quick communication available here,” describing the blogging world as being “vibrant,” and stating that he was very interested in using it not only for his current campaign, but also as part of renewing a general debate within and about the party, and for future elections. He said, “I’m really interested in blogging as a key component of the party, and its campaigns and debates, un the future.”

He informed us that he did at one stage wonder whether we could rebuild the grassroots of the party when all the indices show us in freefall, and whether the deputy campaign could engender this – a solid reason for not abandoning the election, as some politicians have suggested.

One of his staff mentioned visiting the Democrats and how they had found blogging to be very useful, but that they also found it difficult to link that in with the grassroots campaigning, something which is currently being addressed by several Labour bloggers I could name. Cruddas outlined two different conceptions of the role of blogging, one being to view it as an end in itself, supplanting traditional campaigning methods, the other being to view as one component of a much wider campaign, taking the latter view.

When asked about whether he thought politicians’ could allow the public to appropriate their message, to have a sense of ‘ownership’ of that message by being involved in the creative process, something which blogging, facebook, and similar phenomena tends to do, Jon was very honest, saying “its quite exposed, quite a vulnerable position to be in, when you do it right…that goes against the gain of the standard psychology of politicians.” That said, Jon is no standard politician, and he does seem willing to embrace and adapt to the new forms of campaigning which are now becoming more and more prevalent in British politics.

Others have noted his comments regarding his decision not to accept the deputy prime ministership, should he be successful, so I would be a knave not to mention it. He was pretty clear that he could (constitutionally) and would want to be in the Cabinet, in order to be a spokesperson there for the party, and he would accept the principle of collective responsibility in so doing. He also intimated that we should abolish the post of Chair of the party, since the line of agency did not stretch so far as having an influence on Cabinet sessions (perhaps that point is my own and not Jons? Hopefully he’ll see this, so we can find out) and the post is not democratically decided, hardly in keeping with the idea of having a democratic party. He also said of having the deputy leader fulfilling the role he has outlined, “it signals a much more deliberative method of policy formulation with the party included at an earlier stage,” thus hopefully preventing the party feeling policies are simply dropped on it, like top-up fees.

Throughout he was polite, and generally calmly spoken, except for the occasional betrayal of what seemed a genuine excitement on his part to be discussing these issues with his fellow Labour members and supporters. Having had the opportunity to have met him, I can attest to this affability being an integral part of who he is, a good sign for one who aims to be the link between the party at large and the PLP. It shouldn't worry readers that these traits might make him a weak link, since he can also be quite outspoken and, as I've said previously, formidable in debates. When called upon to describe him, I am reminded of the latter part of a quote by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, which I have mutated to form the title of this post, "Divide and rule, a sound motto. Unite and lead, a better one." The only question which remains to eb answered, is whether the party give him the chance to demonstrate this in practise, as our Deputy Leader.

Okay, that’s it. My report of the conference, in all its glory. Well, almost. There are a couply of other things I could say, but I am just working from my notes and would feel more comfortable about posting the remaining titbits of information after having checked that doing so would be okay. There’s nothing controversial, I just want to check the accuracy of my notes. Enjoy!

Oh, and do head over to his site and read his posts. But go easy on him, he's only just got into this blogging experience, so I'm sure he'd appreciate the occasional kind word of encouragement. He was also very interested to hear our suggestions for how to develop his campaign, so feel free to post any ideas you might have.

* Based on the accounts those who have had the chance to speak to him, or hear him debate/give a speech.

Ow. My Head.

2006-12-19T16:45:00.000Z

I would have used exclamation marks, but that would have hurt my head too much*. Yes folks, I am officially hungover. Despite getting up at 7am not feeling too bad beyond a lightly throbbing headache and having liberally quaffed the requisite ibuprofen over my breakfast of tea and toast, I now feel as if I have an IV attached to me, specifically designed to remove every fluid ounce of energy from my body.

To be fair, I did not consume a great deal – just half a bottle of champagne I had been given and had chilling ain a conveniently located fridge, followed by a couple of pints in Bellamy’s Bar. Yet I made the godawful and schoolboy error of not having eaten since breakfast; odd when you consider that I am neither godawful nor am I a schoolboy.

Suffice it to say that the champagne (possibly the worst beverage to have sloshing around an empty stomach) and lager (2nd worst) left me a little worse for wear. Strangely for one who usually manages to recollect the finer points of even the most debauched of evenings, I have no idea how I got on the tube or the ride itself. The night only picks up again as I am walking the streets of Bow towards my cosy abode.

And it was here that I came across the most devious alcohol demons: a late night MacDonalds. And I had money on me. Fortunately, I resisted the drunken temptation to order everything on the menu. Unfortunately, I ordered a milkshake. A milkshake! Of all the post alcohol drinks one can devour, this one is probably the most suicidal (drinks do have feelings, y’know, lol), with its thick texture and frozen taste combining to make it a pleasant enough drink with horrible consequences the following morning. But devour it it I did. No prizes for guessing why I feel so iffy now.

And therein lies my explanation of why you shall have to wait until this afternoon to read my account of last nights conference with Jon Cruddas which, fortunately, occurred prior to my drinkage, and which, fortunately, I took notes on.

I hereby apologise to anyone I offended/bored/your description of my drunkenness here.

Now, I wonder if that cork ever turned up?

• Let the records show that I wrote this this morning. Yet in post-alcoholic melancholy managed not to “publish.”

Books I Do Own (1)

2006-12-19T00:26:00.000Z

Given my recent post.... here are some books I do own. I live with a first year politics student who asked if I knew anything about the "postwar consesnus" to which I responded, not only with these boks but including these books. and here they are. in all their glory (i received them back tonight andyes, as the title suggests, I amt he owner of them).

Howard Glennerster Socil Policy Since 1945 (2nd Edition) - this I would highly recommend. I defy anyone to speak with authority on social policy since 1945 without having first read it.

Anthony Giddens Beyond Left and Right (garbage book, IMO)

Steven Fielding The Labour Party (slightly better, if not brilliant)

cruddas interview update forthcoming.

Cruddas Conference Call.

2006-12-18T18:57:00.001Z

Okay, the conference call has just ended, Jon was in fine form. I'm going to blog about it later tonight, so watch this space.

(And if anyone who was present wouldn't mind posting a comment so I cann add you, as I only managed to take notes for about half the attendees, that would be utterly fantastic).

:-)

UPDATE: will fill out interview details tomorrow am since I'm a little drunk on champamgne and Jon did a stellar job and I don't want to do him a disservice by posting badly in this state

Cruddas Conference Call.

2006-12-18T18:57:00.000Z

What Do You Want To Ask Jon Cruddas? Urgent.

2006-12-18T15:44:00.000Z

Okay, from 6pm tonight, I'll be able to ask Jon your questions, so post them here and I shall do. Provded they're not too lewd, that is.

I'll check this at 5.30pm today, so make sure you post by then!

Phallically Shaped Objects - Just For El Tom.

2006-12-18T01:02:00.000Z

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (5)

2006-12-17T21:38:00.000Z

Okay, here's the week's roundup of how the respective deputy candidates are doing on facebook. To make it a little more useful, I've cross-referenced the groups sizes from my last update, so the first numbers in brackets indicate what the sizre of the group was at the last count, and the second set of bracketed number very handily give you the size change over time. Over christmas, I'm hoping to do an update which looks at how the groups have done since I started blogging about them. Note the operative word in that sentence, hoping.

As we can see (below), two candidates have lost support since the last update, while the rest of the groups continue to display growth. The largest growth is evident in the Cruddas group, up 6 on the last update. It will be itneresting to see how the growth rates change over the coming months - I wonder if the Cruddas group can maintain its title as the biggest growing group?

Facebook Deputy Leader Support Group Update in Numercial Terms:

Johnson - 229 (233) (-4)
Cruddas - 51 (45) (+6)
Harman - 15 (11) (+4)
Blears - 14 (15) (-1)
Hain - 13 (11) (+2)

Clever Housing.

2006-12-17T18:42:00.000Z

I live in a large block of flats. I say 'large' its about 20 floors (I think). Its a fairly new development, by Barratt homes I think...I'm making an inference from their having offices on the ground level and Barratt flags flying in our car park. The fact that we have a "concierge" is what sold me on it - three years at Oxford and you have to like the idea of telling friends "oh yah, daaahhhling, just ask the concierge for me," even just a little bit.

But there is a really clever aspect to the design of the whole building, besides the concierge. The ground floor also boast, for residents only, a small gym, steam room and sauna. I have just spent the past half hour in the gym - I wouldhave spent longer, but one of the running machines istemporarily broken and there was a huge queue for the only operating one. Still, that needn't be too much of a problem, since having a gym in my building has encouraged me to build in 45mins-1 hour per morning down there keeping fit, as well the occasional longer weekend sesh.

Now, I don't know about my readers, but I used to be very active, playing football well enough to go pro (til I realised us lowly women don't get paid, and thus explaining my distate for the overhyping of a certain ex-England "star" who is really not that talented), playing tennis for the women's section of my club at the age of 14 and at city level, and swimming (again in a club). But then something happened. Two things, really. Playing guitar and going to university. Both induced a lifestyle which consisted of alcohol, not exercising (unless you count arm movement along certain phallically shaped objects) and smoking.

Suffice it to say that, while not overweight, I am certainly now out of shpe. And all previous motivation, nay, delight for all things sporting has drained away. Or at least, it had. But then I moved to this wonderful new complex.

In fact, the "workout willingness" has reached the extent that when, recently, two friends mentioned that they were planning to do a 10K run in March, instead of responding with disdain or pointing out that there was no way in which they could ever obtain my involvement in such a hideous jaunt, I said "oh, 10K doesn't sound too bad.....I'm already doing several K each morning in the gym, so I'm sure with some work I could manage it." And so it was that I became complicit in this March-scheduled running endeavour.

But living in such a well-planned building does force me to feel (even more strongly than I did before) that people's lives could be dramatically improved if more thought went into the simple things (!) like house/flat design. Going back to the Atlee and following Tory governments, yes the Tories did outbuild Labour in the 1940's-1950's, but they also built smaller homes, and you can quite easily tell the difference in the quality of housing built under each party nowadays. I don't want this to turn into a partisan rant too much, because either party can fail to consider quality as much as they prize quantity, but I do think it important to socialism/social democracy/whichever lefty creed most suits you, that we ensure that ideas like the one impleented in my block of flats are integral to all possible projects.

Forget putting "obese warnings" on clothes, or trying to introduce a "fat tax" (just search the Number 10 petitions site, if you don't believe the latter) - just make sure new developments have exercise opportunities built into them. Part of my rent is due to there being a gym downstairs, and knowing its just a 5 mins walk away and that I'm paying for it enttices me into using it. It also means that I can use it during quiet times, should I not want to be embarrassed (believe me, I made sure my first gym trip was when I was the only one in there, just in case I had to give up after 5 minutes, lol).

In other, yet related news, having claimed to eat moderately healthily, a friend tipped me off to this which informs you about how healthy your diet actually is. I'm going to try it for one week, just to find out. I may be persuaded to let you know the outcome.

And that's my Toynbee-esque post of the day done. Now, lets see her take the healthy food test. ;-)

Alan Rickman Supports Labour.

2006-12-17T15:03:00.000Z

Given my recent post about my new boss, I thought I'd find out what movies Alan Rickman was doing these days, aside from the obvious Harry Potter series, and I came across this in an interview....

Are you still a staunch Labour supporter?
Well, I certainly think, 'Who else are you going to vote for?'

Daym right! His Good Eggyness suddenly increases.

(Whole interview can be accessed here - http://www.handbag.com/gossip/celebrityinterviews/alanrickman/)

Weird.

2006-12-16T17:11:00.000Z

I was checking my stats for the day, and this came up

(ISP) Oxford (City) Swindon England United Kingdom

Now, I didn't do a geography degree when I was at their univeristy, so I may be mistaken, but I have reason to believe that Oxford is not in Swindon.

Books I Wish I Owned (1)

2006-12-16T12:40:00.000Z

During my time reading politics at university, there were several books I kept promising myself I would purchase, but I never quite got around to doing so. They're either really great books, or the kind of thing that any self-respecting leftie should have on their bookshelf, or both. Aside from the one in honour of G.A. Cohen, which I've not read, but which just sounds interesting. Hopefully my new situation (see post below) means I can acquire some of them in the new year, but I thought I'd post about them here, in case anybody reading wanted something longer to thumb through over the Christmas break.

English Question by Robert Hazell (2006)

Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny (Issues of Our Time) by Amartya Sen,

Kinnock, The Biography. Martin Westlake, London: Little, Brown and Company 2001. pp. 768.

A Short History of the Liberal Party 1900-2001 by Chris Cook

Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-term Perspective (Paperback) by Geoffrey Evans (Author), Pippa Norris (Author)

Electoral Systems and Party Systems_A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990 by Arend Lijphart

Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Paperback) by Antonio Gramsci

The Future of Socialism (Paperback) by Anthony Crosland (Author), Gordon Brown (Introduction)
History, Labour, and Freedom (1988) by G.A. Cohen

Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality (1995) by G.A. Cohen

The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen (2006); edited by Christine Sypnowich

The Rise Of The Meritocracy in 1958, by Michael Young

There were others, but I can't recall their full titles and authors off the top of my head.

The Happy Bunnyness of a Certain Scrybe Revealed. Fully.

2006-12-15T21:36:00.000Z

I’ve only just got in*. I’ve been traversing the country today, and my return journey has been spent with a little smile on my little face. Scrybe is a happy bunny. A very happy bunny indeed, and about to tell you why….

Scrybe got “headhunted” – twice**! Both for serious research work!! Hence today’s trip (and the past week or so’s happy bunnyness), which was for an interview for the post I can now say I have accepted. It was, rather, a day spent getting familiar with the team I am working with and the projects I am working on, preceded by a brief “project-placement” and salary negotiation session. The latter was more a case of me sitting there in astonishment as my ideal starting salary was met and then some.

The team all seem to be fairly kewl, and my boss is an absolute legend…you might just recognise him……

Actually, that’s not him at all***, but a representation of him produced by a conveniently present sketch artist. My ‘line manager’ is also a particularly affable chap with whom I chatted prior to the “project placement” sesh.

The other “serious research post” I got “headhunted” for was a project based here…

Alas, I now have to decline that one. This is really a shame, since it was a fantastic research project and, more importantly, would have resulted in me having my own desk in the politics dept. of the university of which I am a recent alumnus (and anyone preparing to shout “Toff!” should recall this) and thus an interesting simple twist of fate (as a Mr. Dylan might sing) which would have seen me working alongside those who not so long ago tutored me. But I have to admit that I love my new job even more than I would love to have seized that once-in-a-lifetime experience.

I also become an occasional “commuter” (see picture below – bonus points for being able to discern the title of the book), which will be fun (for the first week or so, before the novelty wears off), but it does mean me exercising a modicum of responsibility vis avis not getting rat-arsed the night before a commute. A miniscule price to pay for what is, officially, The World’s Greatest Job.

Thus it is that a certain Scrybe’s happy bunnyness (and its social basis) has been revealed. But, for those of you who did not comprehend the nature of my current euphoria, please find it depicted for you in t-shirt form below…..

But!!! There are further reasons for Scrybe’s happy bunnyness. And they are, in no particular order…..

(a) Scrybe’s pseudonym shortly being in print….for researchy type stuff. Sort of.
(b) Scrybe’s general fancying of persons unnamed
(c) Scrybe’s financial security (as guaranteed by TWGJ – see, it does everything!)
(d) Scrybe’s New Series! To be innovatively entitled, “constituency Focus,” it shall, quite surprisingly, consist of a short series of “focus posts” exploring the issues pertinent to, and dynamics of, specific constituencies in and around LDN.

Oh, and soon….I shall know more about Bob Piper’s local area than Bob Piper himself! (This is partially true, but included purely to verify if he is reading…I await some interesting comments).

Now, who's coming to my celebration drinks? :-)

• Admittedly I got in a while a go, but blogger was playing up, so I typed this up in word.

** To be fair, “headhunted” is somewhat misleading, since I am not the only nor the best person in the country to do my job. Suffice it to say that neither post had been advertised and I got first refusal, so to speak, and those recruiting were rather receptive (eager?) about the idea of recruiting me. Update: that is being headhunted, according to Andrew Brown.

*** The pictures are, of course, of legendary supakewl actor Alan Rickman. My boss just resembles him, mannerism wise. Minus the surliness, thankfully. My boss may or may not have a page on the frankly shitty CiF - but even if he does, he still gets the kewl-vote (the kewl-vote is, of course, recognised by all leading psephologists).

Scrybe's Happy Bunnynes Explained (1)

2006-12-15T21:05:00.000Z

Yippee!!!!!!!!!!! Chek this out I'm ranked joint first!!!!!!!!! And, according to my little device for blog-visit monitoring, I'm averaging 200ish visits per day!! Success!!!!!

Full explanation of happy bunnynes to follow.

Pick of the Petitions. (1)

2006-12-14T20:28:00.000Z

I had to trawl through a search of the e-petitions at Number 10 to see what had been suggested regarding "parliament" (just for fun, you understand) and came across these....

Petitions like this one make me consider that the e-petitions function may serve one glorious purpose - discouraging people from sending petitions which it is, quite frankly, a social embarrasment to publicly support. But then, I see it happens anyway.
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to To acknowledge fetishism and sadomasochism as sane sexual practices (23 signatures)

A petition to keep Galloway off the top spot in the charts?
For the past few years the lucrative music market at Christmas has been dominated by manufactured TV tie-in 'acts'. We know that the Prime Minister can play the guitar, so how about releasing a song this Christmas to give us a change at the top of the singles charts? This would be great for the British recording industry and would also, I am sure, increase younger voters' interest in politics. (25 signatures)

This one is for the Hamers....
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Move Parliament to Bradford. (59 signatures)

This is what I was actually looking for, I knew that someone had to have created it......
We cannot afford both parliament and royalty anymore! Politicians are too expensive. They are untrained in what they do and yet they want parity with doctors and head teachers. Cromwell must be turning in his grave, he knew about this sort of corruption and self-interest. Taxation is getting so bad now that there is nothing out there that isn't taxed to the hilt and it can only get worse. Brown has turned into Dick Turpin rather than actually deal with anything,throwing money at the problem. Big egos create ever increasing entourages, and this is what the infrastructures have become. my solution is(as the infrastructures are now there),make the royal family work for a change), anne in charge of Defra(we won't get any £200 million fines for not paying up on time). Getting rid of hundreds of mp's would save millions before even tallying their expense accounts and perks.They are just 'hogs in the trough'and removed from any 'real' reality. (1 signature, thgouh I'm somewhat tempted to add to it, just for fun)

And finally....
The Cornish have long maintained that they are a nation seperate from Scotland, Wales and England. They have their own language, and once had their own currency, and in the past the Cornish Stannary Parliament could veto Westminster. A large percentage have preveously petitioned for a Cornish National Assembly. They once produced 1/4 of the worlds tin to fuel the industrial revolution, and still produce 1/4 of the china clay. 4th? whatever happened to Northern Ireland? (35 signatures)

Must Be The Winter Weather...

2006-12-14T18:00:00.000Z

But it seems like several unpleasant (to say the least) old sods have been popping their clogs lately*. The blogging world united over the passing of Pinochet, with bloggers outdoing each other in wishing him a speedy trip to Hades. I refrained (mainly because I had other things to do at the time), but I will bring your attention to this. That's right folks, the Ex-Militant Tendency leader of Liverpool Council, John Hamilton, has snuffed it. He was 84. Funny that, since '84 was the year that I was born, under that Militant Council in Liverpool. And I can't say I'll be sad to see this bugger go. In fact, I might just pop to the local supermarket and acquire some wine to celebrate.

The snivelling roach of a specimen that is Derek Hatton, his Deputy, is perhaps a little better known. He was last spotted working as a crooner in dodgy nigthclubs (see picture).

Personally, and I seldom say this, I would have liked to have given the both of them a good kicking.

As for an obituary, you might recall Militant Tendency ignoring the then Conservative Government's budgets, thus bankrupting Liverpool Council in 1984-85, leading to Kinnock's now infamous 1985 party conference speech. When they realised they had bankrupted the council, they attempted to comply with relevant rules by sacking all council staff. Suffice it to say that the delivery services refused point blank to delver the redundancy notices. Thus it was that those cuddly, lovable, caring so-called socialists of Militant Tendency thought a Really Good Idea would be o send the notices to staff by hiring a fleet of 25 taxis to do the job. Right fucking clever guys. Right fucking socialist of you. You might also recall Militant Tendency refusing to appoint a race relations officer to the Council, only to eventually cave in to this 'suggestion' when they realised that, in doing so, they could fix the interview process and give another job to a Militant Tendency stooge from London who knew jack shit about race relations, despite several well qualified individuals also applying for the post. This was in 1985 (I think, bear with me I was only 1 year old at the time). The Toxteth Riots had happened in 1981. Sense? Any sense? I doubt it. And don't even get me started on Blunkett and his pacts with this lot, the fucking twat.

* I apologise for the strong language contained in this post. If you knew Militant Tendency, you'll understand why I am using it.

Update: Forthcoming posts shall include "Why I Am A Marxist" (and an explanation of the happy bunnyness of a certain Scrybe, but I thought the Marxist post interesting to mention here)

Required Reading (1).

2006-12-14T15:40:00.000Z

I'm going to make an effort to promote posts on other blogs that I think are particularly well written, give our mainly British and mainly Labour readership a perspective they may not be regularly exposed to, or are generally worth a read and unlikely to be spotted by my readership (for various reasons). Sometimes this series shall drift away from blog posts onto articles in other sources, and maybe even the odd book review.

Today, however, the inaugral post shall be in keeping with the rules laid out above. The reading suggestion comes from Tom Watson's blog. No, not the MP! The other one, the one who happens to reside on the other side of the Antlatic, and who has been a jounralist there for over 20 years. Hell, the guy even has a taste for Warren Zevon, so he clearly gets the kewl vote. His post is on the American critic Maureen Dowd and a particularly lame effort she has recently produced. And it fulfills every one of the three criteria stipulated by me for this series. Suggestions for future additions to the series are most welcome.

Rather than copy the whole thing into my post, I urge you to click the linnk and read on. But here are some select literary excerpts to whet your appetite for this laudable post by an esteemed journo*.

"Leaving aside the clueless racism in today's column - her apparent understanding of black American "perplexity" is less nuanced than a comic book - Dowd's continued attacks on Hillary Clinton deserve further commentary"

"Dowd conveniently ignores that fact that once declared, Hillary Clinton wore those pumps out working every back-road and strip mall in New York State - that she didn't do the fainting couch routine against the younger, handsome Republican Rick Lazio, but outworked his Long Island machine ass in every facet of that campaign. Watching her roll up John Spencer this year like a piece of used chewing gum, while spending lavish sums and her own time to help fellow Democrats, I never sensed that she was struggling with her sexual planets."

* I sincerely hope that TW doesn't mind me posting excerpts (Ive not checked) and that I haven't breached copyright or anything (again, I havent checked). In my defence, may I just say that I hope this posts leads to my readership peeping his page, thus it falls under the banner of a charitable donation, and you can't sue me for that, surely! Not at Christmas! ;-)

Trevor Phillips U-Turn.

2006-12-14T11:34:00.000Z

This one's for Will, who commented on my ealier post about the 2006 Racial Equality Awards.

We all recall Trevor's speech in September 2005 where he advanced the argument that we were sleepwalking into segregation, don't we? Well, on 7 March 2005, the BBC reported that Trevor had made a slightly different speech. This one suggested that it was in the interest of black pupils, particularly black male pupils, to be taught separately from their contemporaries in school.

Yet, six months later, Trevor made the now infamous "sleepwalking into segregation" speech and, "Mr Phillips told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that schools should be leading the way in terms of integration but research had shown they were in fact slightly more segregated than their wider neighbourhoods." Quote taken from, yes you guessed it, the BBC.

And, as an early Christmas present to my readers, I have saved you the trouble of having to click on the links, by reprinting the two pieces, both from the BBC, below.

Black boys 'segregation' rejected

Black boys' exam results are below average
Teaching underachieving black boys in separate classes for some subjects has been rejected by the government.
Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality, suggested they might benefit from such a move, which had been tested in the United States.

But the Department for Education and Skills said such separation would have "negative effects" and risked "stigmatising" black pupils.

Head teachers had questioned the legality of racially-divided lessons.

In England, only 27% of Black Caribbean boys got five or more good GCSEs last year, considerably below the national average for boys of 46.8%.

Among girls, 44% of Black Caribbean girls achieved five or more good GCSEs, against a national average for girls of 57%. Black Caribbean pupils are also three times more likely than white pupils to be excluded.

'Wall of attitude'

After visiting a scheme in the US, Mr Phillips suggested some black boys were hampered by a lack of self-esteem and positive role models, as well as an attitude that being clever was not cool.

Saying, 'I want you to go to room five instead of room one because you're black', potentially could create a great deal of difficulty
Martin Ward
SHA

School separation 'no solution'
Black school's traditional values

"If the only way to break through the wall of attitude that surrounds black boys is to teach them separately in some classes, then we should be ready for that," he said.

But the Department for Education and Skills said research showed segregation was not the best way forward and could "have negative effects in terms of teacher and pupil expectations".

"There are schools where black boys are achieving at the highest level. These schools don't segregate pupils in the way suggested," said a spokesperson.

'Extra help'

The Secondary Heads Association warned any segregation based on skin colour could create "great difficulty" and may be illegal.

If it's a scheme to help their education then how can it be racist?
James Bucknall, Scotland

Have Your Say

SHA deputy general secretary Martin Ward told BBC News: "Saying to a pupil 'right, I want you to go to room five instead of room one because you need extra help', that's one thing.

"Saying 'I want you to go to room five instead of room one because you're black' potentially could create a great deal of difficulty."

But Shahid Malik, chairman of the Labour Party's ethnic minority forum and a former CRE commissioner, said "many African-Caribbean people would feel it was a debate whose time had come".

Black teachers

Speaking on BBC's Inside Out programme Mr Phillips had also suggested black fathers not living with their sons should be denied access to them if they refused to attend parents' evenings.

If they can't be bothered to turn up for parents' evening, should they expect automatic access to their sons?
Trevor Phillips

Raising black performance
Teachers' Jamaican lessons

And he called for more male black teachers, tempting them with extra cash if necessary.

His comments were not aimed at black girls - GCSE results in England show that "black African" girls are scoring higher grades than "white British" boys.

The CRE said that Mr Phillips had not called for all black boys to be segregated in schools.

It said he was "not sure" how the US measures would work in the UK, but that he felt "we should look at the scheme to see if we can learn anything from it".

Inside Out will be broadcast at 1930 GMT on Monday on BBC One in the London area.

Britons warned over 'segregation'

The young are 'more exclusive' than older people, Mr Phillips said
The UK must enforce "equality, participation and interaction" to avoid US-style segregation, the head of the Commission for Racial Equality says.
Failing to do so could lead to people living in a New Orleans-style Britain of passively co-existing communities, Trevor Phillips warned.

It was a worrying fact that "younger Britons appear to be integrating less well than their parents", he said.

The comments were "very pessimistic" said his predecessor, Lord Ouseley.

Mr Phillips was speaking at a Manchester Council for Community Relations lecture.

If we allow this to continue, we could end up... living in a New Orleans-style Britain of passively co-existing ethnic and religious communities
Trevor Phillips

Schools 'must fight segregation'

He cited economic and racial divisions in the US which, he said, were highlighted by Hurricane Katrina.

"Residentially, some [UK] districts are on their way to becoming fully fledged ghettos - black holes into which no-one goes without fear and trepidation, and from which no-one ever escapes undamaged," he said.

"If we allow this to continue, we could end up in 2048, a hundred years on from the Windrush, living in a New Orleans-style Britain of passively co-existing ethnic and religious communities, eyeing each other uneasily over the fences of our differences."

'American nightmare'

Mr Phillips said America's "segregated society" had been caused by a "failure to act until they were in too deep to get out of the state they are now in.

To be so sweeping to suggest that in Britain we're not talking to each other, we're not aware of differences, we're not getting on in many parts of the country, I think is totally wrong
Lord Herman Ouseley

"That is why, for all of us who care about racial equality and integration, America is not our dream but out nightmare."

Mr Phillips also warned that communities were being left "marooned outside the mainstream".

These would "steadily drift away from the rest of us evolving their own lifestyles, playing by their own rules and increasingly regarding the codes of behaviour, loyalty and respect that the rest of us take for granted as outdated behaviour that no longer applies to them".

And he warned that levels of racial segregation in Britain could create a "fertile breeding ground for extremists".

"It also remains true that younger Britons are more exclusive than older Britons," he said.

Community relations

Lord Herman Ouseley, a previous head of the CRE, said: "I think he's right not to warn us to be complacent because there are difficulties and problems in some parts of the country.

"But to be so sweeping to suggest that in Britain we're not talking to each other, we're not aware of differences, we're not getting on in many parts of the country, I think is totally wrong."

Home Office Minister Paul Goggins welcomed the issue of integration being raised.

"We have very good community relations in this country and its something to be proud of and to build on," he told BBC News.

"But he's right to say we need to do yet more to make sure our communities are fully integrated."

Earlier on Thursday, Mr Phillips told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that schools should be leading the way in terms of integration but research had shown they were in fact slightly more segregated than their wider neighbourhoods.

2006 Racial Equality Awards.

2006-12-14T10:43:00.000Z

It has been announced today* that this year, the Award for Excellence in the Field of Promoting Racial Equality is to be shared by two individuals who have together strived to create an understanding among the public at large that all races are equal. The award goes to Ken Livingstone and Trevor Phillips, for collectively and conclusively demonstrating that both white and black people can be equally idiotic at times. We salute you.

The results were due to be announced a while ago, but were delayed due to my being extremely busy/lazy (delete where you think appropriate).

Jon Cruddas on the Phone... Web Exclusive.

2006-12-13T14:05:00.000Z

Jon Cruddas MP for Barking and Dagenham, and also one of the candidates for the deputy leadership, has announced that he will be holding a conference early next week for bloggers and members of the facebook group.

Participants will be able to speak to Jon about his campaign plans, and there will be a Q&A session as part of the event. From what I hear, it will take place by phone, although I am yet to receive the full details.

This is a fantastic opportunity for bloggers to probe the mind of one of the most interesting deputy leadership candidates standing so far. It is also a web-exclusive, since there will be no mainstream media people involved (to the best of my knowledge).

I'm definitely going to particiate, and shall be blogging about it afterwards. It is a shame none of the other candidates have considered this a worthy way of interacting with the grassroots supporters, as it would have been brilliant to be able to do a blogging-interview series, of sorts. But Jon has made the decision to get involved, so I'll be supporting that, and hoping that the other candidates start to realise how useful such endeavours could be.

If you have any questions that you would like me to ask him, don't hesitate to post them here, and I'll do my best to get them asked. If you are a fellow blogger or facebooker, perhaps you would prefer to join the event yourself. Anyone can sign up to faceboook, and the Cruddas group is called "Cruddas for Deputy" - you can search for it once you have joined. The details of how to become involved were released there first, so its really worth joining if you want to stay ahead of the rest when it comes to knwoing what's going on, Marvin Gaye would say.

I may update this post over the weekend a I get more information about it.

Blogging and Campaigning: Notice Board. MUST READ!!

2006-12-12T21:38:00.000Z

Okay, I posted about an event recently and some of us thought that it would be useful if there was some level of Labour organisation when it came to publicising events. I went away and did plenty of thinking (okay, about ten minutes while at work today), and I cam up with this:

A New Blog (No, this one isn't closing down, it will be another blog), inventively titled "The Notice Board."

I'll set up an email account to which anyone can send their events. It will be checked at certain points during the day, and events listed. This way, in addition to being advertised on individual blogs, there will be a blog-format one stop shop for all events. They can be campaigning events, CLP events, think tank events, anything Labour related (even in the most tenuous of ways - all charities, etc., also welcome).

Posts will be tagged with their topic, and region, and the region name will follow the format given by B4L for ease of use.

It would, of course, be useful if other bloggers volunteered some time to sustain this project - the more we have, the less time will be taken up for each of us. Since you would have access to the email address people send events to, I would have to require that you are first listed on B4L as 'proof' of your legitimacy.

I'm hereby calling upon NewerLabour and Parburypolitica to do their fair bit. Mainly because the latter suggested the idea, and the former is a student. Being a student entails (a) having a lot of time, and (b) thinking ideas like this are worth doing. Taken together, (a) and (b) entail (c) signing up to help. Any other volunteers are more than welcome.

I suggest people email and include links by simply posting the url before the word(s) they want used as the link. If it is more than one word, please indicate using quotation marks (or something similar. We can then perfrom the requisite actions vis a vis inserting code.

Please post your comments regarding this idea. If it is supported, I shall personally set up the new blog, an email account for it, and pledge to email all Labour MPs and thinktanks (over the next month or two, given that its Christmas), informing them of this new and wonderful service. But please post, even if its only a "yes, I agree" post, so I have some idea of the level of support for it. Any suggestions for how to develop it (bear in mind my lack of IT skills beyond simple blogging), would be welcomed, too.

One of Those Days...

2006-12-11T22:49:00.000Z

Today was one of those days were I thought I had achieved a lot until I assessed what tangible things had happened, and then I realised that I hadn't actually achieved all that much. I bloody hate those days.

I woke up with a horrible back spasm and after quaffing plenty ibuprofen, applying heat patches and contacting work, I went to sleep in the hope of waking up later feeling better. I did, mildly. Until I checked my emails and found 50 of the suckers waiting for me. Cue two hours spent answering emails of importance, then realising the buggers had replied, then spending another half hour replying to those. I wouldn't mind this at all, except that most were of the contact-introducing and arranging-future-events variety, so it was mostly admin. I hate admin. With a passion.

Then I visited the sites of Bob Piper and Ministry of Truth to catch up with the so-called "storm" they have been in over the weekend. I posted a few sensible things.

Then I phoned a bunch of people on,ly to find out that they were no longer the people I had to speak to. Cue failed attempts to get contacts for people I should be speaking to. Cue lots of cursing every time I hung up.

Then I sent a few emails which did actually progress some of the projects I am working on.

All in all, a pretty pointless day, then. And all of this pointlessness precluded me posting anything of worth on here.

BREAKING NEWS: EXPOSE OF NEWERLABOUR

2006-12-10T21:52:00.000Z

Okay, you heard it here first folks! I can, exclusively, reveal that NewerLabour has, as of earlier today, been co-opted to the Young Fabians as Regions Officer. Congratulations mate, well deserved, and I'm gonna be in touch about stuff, fo' sho. Hope your coach home wasn't too uncomfortable.

And sorry for stealing your thunder regarding announcing this. ;P

Anyone who is not a member of the Young Fabians or, if you are over the age of 31, the Fabian Society, should immediately rectify that situation.

Petition to End Women's Suffrage.

2006-12-10T01:21:00.000Z

I kid you not, and I genuinely can't believe that people actually signed this. LMAO at the group of girls getting really vocal.

http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/suffrage.html

I'm More Democrat Than Republican.

2006-12-10T00:24:00.001Z

Your Vote Score: 14% Republican, 86% Democrat

You fit well with the Democrat party, and you should almost definitely vote Democrat this election.
In fact, you're so strongly Democrat, a political career (or at least some activism )may be in your future.

Should You Vote Republican or Democrat?

Labour Organising The Internet (Pls Read This!!!).

2006-12-09T21:21:00.000Z

This was actually the idea of parburypolitica in a comment on my recent post about fighting the BNP (see below, or recent posts in the side bar). Us Labour bloggers often post about campaigns, yet there is no way of ensuring maximium publicity. Bloggers (and others in the intended audience) from the area may not read that paricular blog, or may simply not have checked that blog recently.

It would be good if we could organise in some way to ensure maximum exposure for campaigns of any sort (be they anti-BNP, pro-Labour, or anything else). Does anyone have any ideas about how we might do this? It could maximise turnout at events significantly, so I welcome suggestions.

If we can come up with a decent idea for doing this, I will commit some time to making it happen, and I'm sure there are others who would willingly help with the project.

Okay, post away!

(I'm a little stuck for ideas, beyond either having an email account people could send info to, to be forwarded to others, or a specific "campaigns" blog people could check)

Fight the BNP

2006-12-09T20:25:00.000Z

This is copied and pasted from Parburypolitica (shotrly getting a link in my links bar), who himself got it form LabourHome:

I have just been shocked to discover that the BNP have six seats on Epping Foresst District Council and they have a candidate in an upcoming by election. If your around on Sunday check this out.

Grange Hill ward by-election

Epping Forest and Redbridge Together Group invites all anti-fascists to join us to defeat the British National Party in the Grange Hill ward by-election on 14 December.

Meet at 10.30am on Sunday 10 December outside Grange Hill station, Manor Road, Chigwell. Grange Hill station is on the Woodford-Hainault section of the Central Line loop. We shall give out a specially written leaflet to all homes on the Limes Farm Estate, which is where the BNP hope to gain votes.

The BNP hold six seats on Epping Forest District Council. We are determined to turn the tide against them at this by-election. Please pass on details of this activity to everyone you know, in your trade union, workplace, faith group and any other organisation you are a member of. It takes just a few minutes to phone or email a friend or colleague to get them to come over and spend a couple of hours with us.

Numbers are important to get the job done and to ensure the security of those taking part. Please check www.stopthebnp.com regularly for any updates and for future anti-BNP activities.
Remember we stand for Hope not Hate. See you there. Epping and Redbridge Together group PO Box 1576, Ilford IG5 0NG.

I hope to be there, but I'm doing something else later in the day, so I've got to see whether I can get to that in time and how long I can give. Hope to see some of you there.

Shortest Political Test.

2006-12-09T17:57:00.000Z

According to this test, I am a Liberal.

LIBERALS usually embrace freedom of choice in personal
matters, but tend to support significant government control of the
economy. They generally support a government-funded "safety net"
to help the disadvantaged, and advocate strict regulation
of business. Liberals tend to favor environmental regulations,
defend civil liberties and free expression, support government action
to promote equality, and tolerate diverse lifestyles.

Which are you?

http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (4)

2006-12-09T14:46:00.000Z

This post includes some comments posted by members of each of the groups, to give you a feel for their nature as well as their size. If you support one of the deputy candidates, please join facebook and join oneof the groups (you no longer need to be a university or shool student to join and there is a wide range of people on there, but none of the weirdos who stalk myspac, thankg god!) - the groups can be found by a simple search once you are a member, the title for each groups is given below when I post some comments from each of them. There has been some change since my last post, so without further ado.........

(numbers in brackets indicate membership size from labour facebook update (3) which dates from 02/12/2006). I've also just added tags for all my posts on this topic, for easy reference. I'm a hard-working,happy bunny of a Scrybe. ;P

Alan Johnson - 233 members (218)
Jon Cruddas - 45 members (39)
Hazel Blears - 15 members (15)
Peter Hain - 11 members (7)
Harriet Harman - 11 members (6)
Hilary Benn - 9 members (0)

I'll update (as an edit) this post shortly, giving details of how the groups have changed in size since update (3).

Jon Cruddas has very kindly agreed to do an interview with the members of his group - if you join, you too can submit questions to him.

Now, for some posts from each group (in the order given in the membership list above).

Johnson for Deputy:

M****** A******* (York UK) wrote
at 1:24am on December 6th, 2006
Despite the fact that his secretary told me he was "too busy to visit" out uni the man is a Legend and proper Labour! Vote Johnson for deputy!

K*** M****** (no network) wrote
at 1:09pm on December 1st, 2006
If he becomes deputy won't this be the first time in history that neither the Prime Minister nor Deputy Prime Minister went to an oxbridge university. Good thing, or not?

Cruddas for Deputy:

S*** T***** wrote
at 12:43am on November 29th, 2006
I don't know [in reference to when Cruddas might himself join the group], but he was speaking at a Young Fabian event tonight and was really impressive. We hit the pub for a post-event drink (sans JC, of course) and he was all anyone would talk about...so good...leadership qualities..you could really believe in him...etc. Even those whom I did not think would have been supporters of him beforehand.

someone asked him which leadership candidate he supported. fortunately, Conor did a wonderful job of chairing and cut the question down as being utterly irrelevant to the debate topic (how labour reconnects with the working class).

J*** G***** wrote on Nov 29, 2006 at 5:02 PM
I think that it is important for the Labour Party to conduct the elections for Deputy Leadership in an open and friendly manner. This is a desperately needed opportunity for the Party to "renew" itself in office; to take an honest and genuine look at its strengths and weaknesses and to act accordingly to improve its fortunes. If we do this successfully we have every chance of beating the Tories at the next general election and thus securing a fourth term of Labour government. However, if the election for Deputy Leader is seen as a divisive event the chances of Labour success will be severely jeapordised. A Labour Party full of incoherence and bitterness is obviously not going to look good next to Cameron's smoothly rebranded Conservatives.

The vast majority of Labour Party members acknowledge this. I'm sure that everyone is aware of how Labour infighting in the 1980s contributed significantly to 18 years of Tory misrule. It seems that - so far at least - everything is being conducted in a friendly manner, and this is certainly to be welcomed. Candidates and their supporters should concentrate their energies on trying to convince members of their individual merits and on articulating their vision for the future of the Labour movement. This is much more constructive than engaging in any sort of negative campaigning.

The Alan Johnson facebook group slightly worries me by making comments such as "If you want a Deputy Leader that listens and doesn't just say what he/she thinks grassroots members want to hear (Hain, Cruddas, Harman) Vote Johnson for Deputy". Of course I accept that it will be required to sometimes criticise the other candidates to an extent, but this claim is just so disingenuous and unnecessary that I think it reflects badly on the Johnson group. Cruddas is the only candidate for Deputy Leader who has outlined a clear policy platform that he would pursue if elected. Much of this concentrates on reinvigorating internal Labour Party democracy - such as allowing party members to elect the party Chair, rejuvenating the National Policy Forum, making sure local parties will be provided with more funding, and increasing the power of Conference over policy - which will undeniably empower the grassroots. It is therefore clearly false to accuse Cruddas of deceitfully only saying what he thinks the grassroots want to hear. I am yet to hear the other candidates (including Johnson) explain how they will give a greater voice to ordinary party members. I think Alan Johnson is a fine politician with admirable qualities and I would definitely want him to retain a high-profile position in any future cabinet. However, as someone who is convinced that drastic change is needed in the Labour Party structure and policy direction if we are to remain in government, it is obvious to me that the only candidate who seems to genuinely want to address those concerns is Jon Cruddas.

p.s I would also like to state that the badtempered post made on our group's profile by the founder of the Alan Johnson group is a very very bad example of conducting this competition in a comradely manner!

Blears for Deputy:

D*** T***** (Texas) wrote
at 2:26pm on November 20th, 2006
You must be joking. All politicians are masters of spin but you'd need a whole new term to describe the rubbish this woman comes out with. Haven't you ever seen her interviews? She never gives a straight answer. The public hates that sort of thing. "When did you decide not to renew the existing legislation?" "Well we've decided to bring forward this new legislation because..." Just answer the damn question!
Message - Report

L**** W**** (London) wrote
at 6:23pm on November 13th, 2006
Sista Blears is just amazing!!
I wonder if she would be the smallest deputy leader ever??? For that reason alone, she should get our vote!!!!

Hain for Deputy:

D** C****** (Kingston) wrote
at 7:50pm on December 3rd, 2006
Anything that will improve politics in this country has my backing. Even if I am not a Labour supporter per se.
Message - Report

Z** P************ (Surrey) wrote
at 1:23pm on December 1st, 2006
hey i love hain! go hain! x

Harman for Deputy:

C** S**** (Lancaster) wrote
at 10:08pm on December 6th, 2006
9 members now... one more, and we'll be in double figures!

T** F***** (Edinburgh) wrote
at 2:58pm on November 23rd, 2006
4 members, wow we are going strong!

Benn for Deputy

A*** H***** (no network) wrote
at 8:25am on December 6th, 2006
Check out www.labourhome.org/2ndgues
s it's a leadership/deputy leadership predictor and you have to guess which mps will support which other mps for the positions
Message - Report

A***** K**** M***** (Kent Uni.) wrote
at 5:05pm on December 5th, 2006
yeah I wish hils was running for leader, and i am really torn on who to vote for but I think it will be either hilary or harman. I am surprised that hils is so low on the membership, seeing as he is front runner for the race! i thought he would have a lot of appeal amongst the students, but (possibly because of HULC) it is johnson who leads the pack, strange considering he is the education secretary.

John McDonnell Speaks On Scrybe.....

2006-12-08T21:40:00.000Z

no kidding, I merited a "just in response to scrybe" post by the leadership candidate on his blog. howzat for a newcomer??? (I'm still smarting from having realised I wont win best newcomer in the Bloggers4Labour poll, j/p).

and here it is, in all its finery:

John McDonnell said...
Just in response to Scrybe

No there was no coach service offered but I tried elsewhere just in case and the time of arrival would have been about 10pm after the planned meeting. As for the first class jibe, I met Bill Cash on the platform. I haven't travelled First Class in my life and don't intend to start now.

By the way when they asked Harry Perkins in "A Very British Coup" whether he was going to abolish First Class he replied "No, I am going to abolish Second Class."

5:33 PM

link to original post by him on his site and the following comments: http://www.john4leader.org.uk/2006/12/birmingham-meeting-cancelled-because.html

Stupid Questions (1)

2006-12-08T07:57:00.000Z

This will be a bi-weekly series of stupid questions asked in classes/lecture halls/debates/etc around the world. Largely brought to you via the wonderful world of facebook (update of Labour deputy groups coming later today!), but I'm also accepting emailed nominations (you may remain anonymous but please specify) to scrybe_84@hotmail.co.uk

This issue's wonderfully dumb question was posted by Natalie Thomson (Fanshawe) on Dec 5, 2006 at 11:14 AM:
I am in a fashion program, one class we were learning how they were developing soy to be used in fabrics, one blond put her hand up and asked "so, if I eat the soy fabric can I taste soy?" ... I was tempted to reply, "well, if you lick your leather shoe can you taste steak?!?"

On the Happy Bunniness of a Certain Scrybe.

2006-12-07T16:14:00.000Z

You may recall a reent post declaring my happy bunnyness. Well, I can no update it slightly. I am a very very happy bunny for reasons that I may be able to disclose by the end of next week. There are, in fact, several causes of my happy bunnyness which, combined, make me think this Christmas might just be a good one. :)

My Pre-Review of Tonight's Progress Event and The New Beta Blogger

2006-12-06T15:32:00.000Z

Okay, I just wrote this quickly in an email to a friend, but felt it worthy of posting here. Its my pre-review of tonight's Progress meeting inventively entitled "one year On: Is Cameron Shaping A New Tory Party?"

"I'm supposed to be going to a progress debate on whether cameron is
forging a new conservative party, but I'm not at all impressed with the title.
its got giddens, deborah mattinson and stephen twigg, and some others I
think.

twigg's chairing, and he's a pretty good egg. mattinson will talk about
women voters returning to the conservatives and how cameron has caused
this(despite the fact that she and harriet harman actually had a meeting
with alan milburn during the 2005 election campaign to tell him women were
deserting labour to return to the tories, and this was prior to cameron
even being known or touted as a future leader, but hey).

giddens will do his messiah-complex stuff(as my british politics tutor
would say, she had the displeasure of studying under him for a while) and
will talk about the third way a lot without mentoining it by name.

some clever sod (possibly twigg) might actually deign to point out that
cameron isn't making a new party at all, since what he's doing (not
explicitly at the moment, but it will become so soon) is returning to
the one nation conservatism of the 1960s which was itself an echo of
Baldwinian new conservatism. however, he is arguably making a "new" tory party, in
the sense of trying to create the ahistorical impression that this venture
is completely new and unrelated to the pragmatism which has been the
hallmark of the conservatives since their inception.

so I pretty much know what will be said."

It actually also involves Ed Miliband MP. He's a good egg. As is Stephen Twigg. So I should go for those reasons. But two and a half hours (since I'll have to kick around the parliamentary estate between 5pm and 6pm if I go) is a long time to spend on seeing a couple of good eggs briefly. Mattinson gives the impression of also being a good egg, but two and a half good eggs is still too little to warrant that much time. In this weather.

Also, am I the only one loathing beta blogger? I have to log in twice since the main page doesn't recognise my google account and I have to use my old one to be told that it has been merged with the google account and will I please log in with that. Buggers. But its a free and otherwise decent blogging site.

Prime Minister to Speak.

2006-12-06T12:02:00.000Z

Shock ing story! (I bet most of you thought he'd been lip-synching all these years, eh?)

This friday, Tony Blar will be giving a speech (at No. 10, I think, but I'm not sure) entitled "Integration and Segregation."

Seems everyone is getting in on the identity politics debate these days. Still, at least he didn't go with a snappier, and possibly alarmist, title for his talk, unlike Trevor Phillips

Scrybe is a Happy Bunny.

2006-12-05T23:31:00.000Z

A very very happy buny. For reasons that cannot, for various reasons, presently be discussed. But watch this space. ;P

Deputy Candidate Faces Inquiry.

2006-12-05T07:19:00.000Z

According to the BBC, a senior QC, Peter Scott, has been appointed to investigate whether Peter Hain misled the High Court over the interim victims commissioner appointment.

It doesn't say how long it will take for the inquiry to present its findings, but this surely cannot be conducive to any campaign Hain might be making for the deputy leadership of the party. But I think he should be given the chance to answer the claims being made against him. I just wonder what he'll have to say about it all.

Tentative Support for MP's Pay Rise Claims.

2006-12-04T23:00:00.000Z

Recent news has included MPs demanding a 66% pay rise something this blog feels would be fair. Considering how much they currently get paid (about £55-60 k per annum) and the hours they put in, they are severely underpaid. Compared to headteachers, one wonders why anyone wold become an MP.

However, I emphasise the "tentative." I just got off the phone with my dear folks, oop nawf (see picture, right*). We had the usual conversation, I was mainly calling to see how my pops was, having just been released from hosdpital, so I did the requisite "wish I was still around, feel bad not being there" line (which is genuine). Then my mother got onto this pay rise business and, specifically, my abysmal financial treatment since working in Westminster. I defended the pay rise as being fair, but the fact is (as she insisted on pointing out to me, and as everyone else feels necessary to point out to me, like living on boiled rice for two months hadn't escaped my attention) they could have prioritised their demands. I'm sure I'm not the only one who can see the legitimacy of their case yet also feels that they would have appeared more justified in raising said case had they also included (and perhaps empahsised) the need for a pay increase for staff and an intern's fund of some description.

* I wish I was exaggerating, but this really is where I was born and raised. Okay, I am exaggerating slightly - the fire has since gone out. But that is where I was born and raised. I just couldn't find an "after" shot.

Wine, and other tippling overs....

2006-12-03T04:06:00.000Z

Okay, I MUST warn you - Tesco's Canti Merlot Sangiovese (from Italy as it repeatedly tells you) is, without doubt, the worst wine I have ever tasted. Admittedly it only costs 4-5 quid. but I've tasted cheaper priced wines which taste better. Well, I figured I should mark my entry into the class of champagne socialists in the appopraite way....I apologies for the wine not being champagen, I'll get around to that once I am ggainfully employed.

Seriously,dont buy this wine - it tastes like cats pee. Not that I've ever actually tasted cats pee , you understand.

Tonight I learned why Patrick Diamond did not do a geography degree. Pub just around the corner?

I also met plentiful interesting people. But none with a story quite as amusing as this one which I shall not even deign to name check - the post about the boy says it all. It acted as a light hearted and parochially amusing counterpoint to the forced mingling with randoms I had to undergo tonight in the name of imminent unemployment. I much prefer mingling when I'm not desperate for a job. Speaking of jobs, have you managed to find me one yet? That may have been particularly directed towards certain particulars, but it applies to all, since my ability to post here is affected by my job hunt.

So much for those generally on-point and intylektural posts I mentioned earlier. I'll try to get back to them. But for now, I am despairing in the midsts of desperation.

The Problem with Trying to buy Essential in December...

2006-12-02T19:06:00.000Z

Oxford St is manic. Like, more so than usual. And what is it with people forgetting how to walk when out shopping? I eventually got what I needed, after much sholder-barging (usually people doing that to me) and fruitless shop searches.

On the up side, Scrybe is off to a party tonight in Waterloo - so I doubt I'll be posting again all weekend. ;P

Forthcoming Posts.

2006-12-02T01:04:00.000Z

I would like to blame my lack of recent posting activity on being incredibly busy. However, my lack of recent posting activity is actually due to a mysterious loss of all energy over the past few days and my spending most of my time asleep good thing dont work thursday afternoons or friday day) and now being incredibly busy since I didn't do the things I was supposed to do while instead sleeping.

Thus it is that, while I have a few posts planned, getting them up here may well take me a day or two. So please find a list of forthcoming posts as a taster to keep you visiting this page. They will, of course, be interspersed with the usual inanities.

In no particular order:
(1) Review/summary of the Charles Clarke lecture to the Fabian Society this week on "The World After Bush"
(2) Statement of political principles (referred to in my Absoluted Idiots (1) post)
(3) Why I am a Marxist
(4) Something on party reform (but not too much, since it is one of my research projects for the new year)
(5) The first post in my Great Figures series. This may or may not be on Michael Young. Or Henry David Thoreau.
(6) A copy of my c.v. should anyone know of any parliament Labour jobs going. (this post may or may not happen, depending upon how desperate I get. anyone with information concerning possible vacancies should email scrybe_84@hotmail.co.uk)

In the meantime, I urge everyone to rent/buy a copy of the movie version of Stephen King's novella, Apt Pupil, since it is a bloody good film. Starring Brad Renfro and Ian McKellan no less.

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (3) and My Support for Cruddas

2006-12-02T00:29:00.000Z

Okay, I have been messaged by el tom to remind me that I am currently neglecting my duties in this regard. So here's an update of this week's standings.

Johnson - 218 members
Cruddas - 39 members
Blears - 15 members
Hain - 7 members
Harman - 6 members

This blog is, of course, supporting Jon Cruddas for Deputy. Having seen him speak, I would argue that he is capable of appealing to a wide range of voters/Labour Party members as he is a formidable personality and is capable of very accurately pitching his speeches/comments to their intended audience (i.e. he doesn't speak over the heads of those who are not experts, yet doesn't patronise those who are). He is the kind of politician who has the potential to be great; he engenders a sense of belief and trust in his audience towards him.

Furthermore, it is wholly evident that something must be done to stem the decline of party membership and political activism more generally. While some point to the rise of single issue grous, as someone I was recently reading astutely ointed out, there is a problem that the idea of direct democracy is being replaced by direct debit. Jon Cruddas is the only deputy leadership candidate who has given a clear outline of how he intends to reform the party stucture so as to empower the grassroots and create genuine incentives for support. He is also (to the best of my knowledge, do correct me if I'm wrong) rightly critical of the idea of supporter's clubs for political parties and how an increase in their scope could act as a disincentive to join the party proper (something I was critical of in an Anticipations article last year).

His plans to separate the party deputyship from the governmental post serves as an indication of his lack of personal gain as a motive for running for this office, and his long standing anti-facism work on the ground is further evidence that he is not merely uttering platitudes designed to curry favour with the currently favoured (i.e. the electorate in this race), but is committed to his plans and lives up to them hmself - a refreshing level of integrity which is as forceful as a slap to the face of cynics of the political process.

Regarding the anti-facism work he has done/is doing, as much as I hate to bring anecdotal arguments to the fray, I have to say that, as someone who spent four years being attacked on the grounds of race (quite seriously attacked), I have the utmost respect for the assiduous work he has undertaken.

My only concern regarding his stance thus far is the possibility that empowering the grassroots could lead to a similar situation as that created by the rise of the Militant Tendency faction within the Labour Party in the late 1970s and early 1980s and the damaging effect it had in places like Liverpool where it bankrupted the council. However, this is not a necessary concomitant of party reform; it would infact be detrimental to the party since the effect of MT in Liverpool was a dampening of party support and grassroots involvement which persists to this day (they bankrupted the council in 1985, not last month or anything). In this regard, I am happy to work with him to ensure that such an event is unlikely to reoccur, and I am confident that he is also concerned about this aspect of party reform. I would rather work with him to ensure that it is prevented than to use it as the sole, and hardly justifiable basis, upon which to withdraw my support for his campaign.

In short, Cruddas rocks!

Cue music.

The Joys of Academia!

2006-11-29T12:56:00.000Z

Am I the only one who gets excited when a googlewhack turns up an article like "Stanley Baldwin, Heresthetics, and the Realignment of British Politics"? I can't help but start bouncing around on my chair at the prospect.

In other news, I was at a Young Fabian event last night on how Labour can reconnect with the working class. I'll post more on this later, but suffice it to say, for now, that Cruddas was formiddable and Liam Byrne his usual inimitable self. Very very good event, one of the best I've ever attended, in fact. I'm including university seminars in that, and I have a wide range of events from which to give this event the estimable accolade of being The Best.

Labour Facebook : We Have Been Noticed.

2006-11-28T18:19:00.000Z

I got my weekle Cruddas newsletter today. Here is what it said:

Hook up on facebook

Facebook is a networking website which people can use to chat and discuss issues. Some people have set up an independent Cruddas for Deputy group on the site where supporters can chat online. Although it hasn’t been set up by us and doesn’t have a formal link with Jon’s campaign, it certainly looks like a great project. If you have a Facebook profile already, click here to join the Cruddas for Deputy group – or you can sign up as a new Facebook member here.

It said some other things too, of course. But I thought this bit was pretty kewl.

Absolute Idiots (1): Nigel Griffith.

2006-11-28T02:15:00.000Z

The White Paper said I would discuss influential and important thinkers/politicians on a weekly basis. I shall. But this fucker needs discussing. In my opinion, he is an on-message, unthinking, lacking-in-leadership, idiotic, career-and-more-importantly-salary-motivated, uninterested, pathetic gimp-cumslave-to-his-post-and-nothing-else, spin-supporting, spin-starting, politician of dizzying height. I apologise profusely to my many Labour friends; I do not like to opney break rank and criticise, but tongiht warrantd such comments. Especally gien my forthcoming (later this wekk, hopefully tomorrow or wednesday) post on political principles. What I will say then requires me to say what I say now.

He spoke to the Young Labour London network tonigh. The topic was "he Queen's Speech - delivering for young London" He spent the overwhelming majority of his speech talking about the pensions. The remainder of his speech was spent denoucning Tories and LibDems, and uurging "US!" "THE LABOUR ACTIVISTS!!!!" to unite and fight against them.

Now, I have noqualms discssingeither or being opposed to the latterly mentoined parties. But, let us return to the debate title. Was he on-message? For the Labour-Party-in0Government? Yes. For the debate topic? NO. Did he say anything of relevance to the debate topic? Yes, if you wish to defend him that much. I'm 22. I think pension reform IS important. I'm willing to discuss it. Just not tonight. That wasn't the point of tonight. Nor was trashing the opposition parties. Especially to a bunch of people who, largely like myself, have extensive Labour Party campaigning experience. It was pointless and contributed nothing to the debate. He was GREEN INKING this evening.

I could citicise him for wonder ful quotes such as, "we've abolished a situation where the minimum employers' pay is ninety nien POUNDS an hour" or "and I [with requisite emphasis added] know that because I [again, emphasis] was a DTI minisiter....once."
But the fact is, he totally missed the point of tonight. Then he left before the audience had the opportunity to verify they had attended the correct event for that evening and grill him on his idiocy.

Like I said, I am reticent in criticising (at least, naming and shaming criticism..I hope those reading this who know me can trust me on this), but he was totally egregious in his comments.

Now, either he intended what he said. In which case I stand by my assertion that said comments were spin-filled egregious statements designed to please no one but himself and. possibly, the upper eschelons of the PLP. Or, he is utterly pathetic when it comes to management and delegation of responsibility, and managed to hire some ape of a bag carrier who failed toread beyond the [hrase "Queen's speech" when it came to the title of tonight's event. Given that the other contributors were all experienced in youth affairs (the NUS president, an MP with plentiful youth work experience and a local authority representative with similar qualities) and the debate title stated the emphasis was on YOUTH affairs, I thought his emphasis on pensions a little strange. As a youth, I have more important things vis a vis my present situation (and that of those following on my heels) than pensions. Its not that they aren't important -it just that they aren't a priority for the youth.

And telling people who have campaigned in various cities (I'm citing here Oxofrd, Liverpool, London, Southampton, Hasting, Tonbridge Wells, though I could probably name more), encouraging activism on that level was hardly an influential thing to say to the upcoming "movers and shakers of British politics" as one Labour MP once said.

Gad, how I hope I'm an acamdeic charged with writing his biography in ten years' time.

Official disclaimer: Please, resheath the daggers until you've read the forthcoming Princiles Post. Also, please, understand that I will post like this irregularly and only when I feel it is of benefit tothe Party to weed out such idiocy. As someone once said, "never allow the idiot to live in your midst, for one day he may rise up against you." okay, I paraphrase, and "idiot" may be a euphemism, but you get the point. As someone else once said "If adults are going to be as stupid as [him], they deserve to be encouraged." I would disagree. Where can we take up the government's local gov. white paper suggestion for partial management of services to get the power to terminate the role of Nigel Griffith and replace him with someone possessing at least one brain cell?

I'm sad to say this, but he is the kind of Labour MP who makes me consder switching sides. In fact, Militant Tendency aside (and the dumb a$$ David Blunkett huggy kissy bull$h!t that accompanied it), he is someone who genuinely manages to make me question my support for the Labour Party.

And yes, I'm prepared to stand behind this. Anyone who wants proof need only ask.

On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Hats

2006-11-26T22:21:00.000Z

Brilliant piece of research, which can be accessed here. Who says MIT nerds don't have a sense of humour?

Disclaimer: Since Lupe Fiasco's Revenge of the Nerds, the term "nerd(s)" is no longer deemed to be offensive. I myself am, quite proudly, a politics nerd.

Info For Local Councillors and "Community Leader" Type Folk.

2006-11-26T21:33:00.000Z

mkay, as part of my "seriousness" drive, I have recently become aware of the fact that Barry Quirk, the Chief Executive of the London Borough of Lewisham, has been asked by the Government to conduct a review into the effectiveness of powers and policies pertaining to community management or ownership of public assets. The reports is due in spring 2007. Any local councillors or group leaders who have attempted to introduce community management or ownership may want to look into this and, perhaps, even contribute information to the report.

And with that, Scrybe's good deed of the day is done. :)

Scrybe's London Diaries White Paper

2006-11-26T18:32:00.000Z

I've been doing this blog and updating regularly (several times a day on most days, in fact), and I've been thinking (mainly looking for distraction from the boring White Paper I am currently reading) about what I like on this blog and what I need to do to develop it. So, without further ado, I bring you....Scrybe's London Diaries White Paper.

(1) Continuation of stuff already done.

1.1 I'll keep updating the Facebook support for the deputy and leadership candidates, with occasional reference to other political trivia (how many people think Cameron's lies make baby Jesus cry, for example). I'm also going to try to tie this in with other commentary on the topic, like the recent post on a poll condcted by a fellow blogger. If you have any info of relevance, email scrybe_84@hotmail.co.uk and I'll try to post about it. If Bloggers4Labour can do that graph widget thing, that would be super-kewl, so get at me about it.

1.2 I'll continue with the occasional inanity, of course.

1.3 I'll try to actually have (2)'s for the posts with (1) after them. Lol. I usually do this, but I've noticed that my Reasons for Keeping the Lords has not been updated since the Queen's Speech despite me having much to say about this.

1.4 I have been encouraging suggestions/contributions to the blog, and this will, of course, continue.

1.5 The "best comments on a blog" weekly prize will continue, so get at me with nominations, either in the comments section of any of my posts or by the email above. Its a shame I didn't start this earlier or get much in the way of nominations, since it might have been a nice addition to the Bloggers4Labour blog awards (I know a lot of bloggers are highly active and, often, very witty contributors to other blogs than their own).

(2) New Stuff

2.1 I'm going to introduce a new dimension to the site. Serious stuff. Don't worry, it wont happen too often, but I'm going to try to be sensible and vaguely on-point about something of political import on a weekly basis or so. Again, I really ought to have done this more already, seeing as I have a wealth of stuff to say.

2.2 I'm also going to do a brief profile of an MP/major current thinker every week or so. Again, contributions/suggestions very welcome. This is more for my own amusement/knowledge (its surprising how many MPs I don't recognise around Portcullis Greenhouse), but may be of interest to the general public. Or the weird variant thereof, formally known as bloggers.

2.3 I'd love a decent banner for the blog, but am without photoshop until I go oop nawf. So, if anyone wants to contribute one I should be very grateful. If not, you may see an aesthetic improvement to the site in the New Year.

2.4 In keeping with my emphasis on empowering local readers I aim to be responsive to the needs and views of said readers, so I shall endeavour to keep systematic intelligence on the aforementioned needs and views and will work with the central blogger authorities to develop methods by which this blog can respond effectively to give local readers choice in how the blog is run. Yes, this is a paraphrase of the garbage I'm reading.

2.5 There will be a small prize for anyone who can suss which White Paper I am currently trying not to read by the clues given in 2.4

Okay, that's it. For now.

Christmas scam - Watch Out.

2006-11-26T17:49:00.000Z

oka, in another bout of laziness I've c and p'd this from another site, schmoo on the run, but I thought it worth bringing to the attention of those who missed it. so here goes:

Tuesday, November 21, 2006
crime for christmas: postal scam alert

WORSE SCAM THAN 'THE MINT' ON ITV HITS BRITAIN

The Trading Standards Office are making people aware of the following scam:

A card is posted through your door from a company called PDS (Parcel Delivery Service) suggesting that they were unable to deliver a parcel and that you need to contact them on 0906 6611911. This is a premium rate number.

DO NOT call this number, as this is a mail scam originating from Belize. If you call the number, and you start to hear a recorded message, you will already have been billed £15 for the phone call.

If you do receive a card with these details, then please contact Royal Mail Fraud on 0207 2396655 or ICSTIS (the premium rate service regulator) at www.icstis.org.uk

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (2)

2006-11-26T01:05:00.000Z

Compare the support (listed in the post further down this page, or with the same title of this post but missing the (2)) for the various deputy candidates as registered on facebook with that registered on the political penguin site (shown in this post - will provide link to political pnguin site shortly, I'm experiencing technical difficulties right now).

Who's your money on for Deputy Leader?
Hilary Benn
7 41.2%

Jon Cruddas
6 35.3%

Alan Johnson
2 11.8%

Hazel Blears
1 5.9%

Peter Hain
1 5.9%

Harriet Harman
0 0%

Jack Straw
0 0%

Creative Learning.

2006-11-25T19:02:00.000Z

£10 to anyone willing to recreate this in their lecture hall (or in Parliament/Portcullis House (the main cafe/greenhouse area)/Council hall/etc, in which case a slight variation on the language may be accepted). You must capture it on some video format and post a link here to qualify for the prize, though).

Labour Deputy Elections Facebook Update

2006-11-24T22:57:00.000Z

This is from about 30 minutes ago. Group membership is as follows:

Johnson: 199 members
Cruddas: 24 members
Blears: 15 members
Harman: 5 members
Benn: 4 members
Hain: 2 members

DO bear in mind that:

(a) many of the Johnson members seem not to be fully in support of him, so his lead may be a little misleading, and
(b) one need not be a member of the Labour Party in order to join these groups, so they may not be indicative of grassroots support which could be translated into votes when the coup (er, I mean election) comes, but
(c) facebook did a pretty good job of calling the recent American elections, so you never know!

Select Committees Linked With Depressive Disorders!!

2006-11-24T22:10:00.000Z

Okay, for reasons of personal interest, I visited the parliament website and typed into the search box on the main page "select committees" since I was, surprisingly, looking for a list of the select committees and who is on each one. Its useful for some work I am currently doing regarding the contributions made in debates by various MPs. Now, I know that people often bemoan the lack of power of select committees vis a vis the government, but I never thought the parliament website would openly acknowledge this. Below is the response my simple search generated; may I bring your attention to the last category:

"Current search: select committees

Are you looking for information on one of the following categories?
Click on it to produce better results.
Business development
Cabinet
Choosing a school
Community grants
Depressive disorders"

Scrybe's Night Out

2006-11-23T00:58:00.000Z

(1) Left work

(2) Considered possibility of pushing certain individuals (herein CI) under SUV's/lorries/passing buses without facing subsequent prosecution.

(3) Phoned certain other indivdual (herein COI) to find out why they were not in the St Stephen's Tavern.

(4) COI turned up and made mistake of asking how Scrybe's day was.

(5) Scrybe regales COI with point (2)

(4) St Stephens is full of political people. Scrybe and COI wander around Westminster. Scrybe repeatedly makes pronouncements which are surely punishable as evidence of attempted terrorism. Or attempted GBH, at least. Or at least ought to surprise passers by. In an attempt to be reasonable, Scrybe resorts to incarticulate "aaarrrrrrggggghhhhh" sounds instead of getting arrested by nearby police for articulate comments.

(5) Scrybe and COI enter pub. COI buys Scrybe plenty gin.

(6) Drinking of gin quells Scrybe's rage. Or at least takes priority over the expression of it.

(7) Scrybe explains legitimate some of the reasons for Scrybe's rage.

(8) Scrybe apologises profusely to COI for erratic behaviour, then explains some of the reasons for it.

(9) COI points out that Scrybe's behaviour is not erratic, but a rational response to an irrational CI.

(10) Return to point (2)

(11) COI plies Scrybe with more gin.

(12) COI and Scrybe wander around Westminster some more, winding up back at St Stephen's Tavern.

(13) Scrybe is further plied with alcohol.

(14) Scrybe is drunk enough to consider switching sides and/or kidnapping CI for purposes of torture comparable to Scrybe's experience today.

(15) Scrybe is drunk enough not to bother, but adds CI to list for "when the coup happens."

(16) Scrybe overhears conversation about football and forgets points (2)-(15).

Anyone care to better this?

Englishness, Britishness, and A Time-wasting Device For People Like Me.

2006-11-22T14:35:00.000Z

Okay, I'm setting my faithful readership a task. I want to know what your identities are. Do you identify with being English, with being Scottish, with being British, or European, or with a local identity? You may, of course, choose as many as you want.

But I also want to know what you think each identity consists of. What function does the identity have for you? e.g. is Britishness a political/state identity, while English is more of a cultural one? Don't take what I've given as an example to be a rigid template - I want to know what your views are. How important are your different (country, state, etc) identities, and how are they important?

It seems to me that most of the commentators in this field spend most of their time disagreeing with each other. So I'm interested in your responses. And background details of relelvance are, of course, welcomed. (If you don't feel comfortable posting all that on here, you can email it to me at scrybe_84@hotmail.co.uk )

Then, tomorrow (or maybe later today if I get your responses quickly enough) I shall post something intelligent for once. Don't consider this a punishment though - you needn't read it if you don't want to.

I know a lot of you are at work right now, so I'm expecting something.

Thanks. :)

Adam's Ricketts.

2006-11-21T21:54:00.000Z

It has been a long, long time since I last heard something about this young chap. Back when he was in Coronation Street, in fact. So, having realised that he is a prospective Conservative candidate, I was a little interested as to why he had chosen to forsake his illustrious musical and theatrical careers for the vaudeville of politics.

I wanted the true explanation, his honest motivation for this decision. So I visited his blog.

On the politics section he said “All I have ever wanted was to be a local MP for a local community and do my utmost to ensure that their concerns and needs are met."

Shame that one of the other pages on his website had this little gem, "Adam's first love has always been drama."

So, will the real Adam Rickett please stabd up? And then go home, and forget about politics? Please.

Bloggger's Comments Award (1).

2006-11-19T20:00:00.000Z

Okay, I enjoy reading various blogs as do most bloggers, but I think we would all agree that sometimes the best blog posts are made by the comments as much, if not more, than the original post itself. In fact, some comments vastly outweigh the amusement/informational content/select appropriate title here than the original post. yet, while blogs and their authors are often commented upon, the worthy contribution of comment-makers often goes unnoticed. With that in mind, I bring the first of a weekly Blogger's Comment Award!

And this week, I think the obvious winner, by several furlongs, is the horseying aroud one HAMER SHAWCROSS on this post's comment section. Were I truly as sycophantic as I sometimes give the impression of being, I would have awarded this week's prize to Tom Watson, with the gift certificate enclosed along with my cv application for a recent vacancy in his office*; Hamer, however, was clearly more amusing.

Well done Hamer.

Please nominate bloggers/proffessional commentors by email to scrybe_84@hotmail.co.uk

* said vacancy may or may not exist.

Facebook Labour Leader and Deputy Elections Update

2006-11-18T20:29:00.000Z

Okay, my mate Jack and I decided that it wasn't fair that some deputy candidates did not have facebook groups. Given that many members of the Alan Johnson group do not actually support him and just want a place to discuss the forthcomng elections, it was skewing our stats. So Jack has kindly set up groups for Harriet Harman and Peter Hain. Hilary Benn and various others have yet to find representation on facebook. But, with that I am now able to give an update of group support. (Please note that Jack is officially suppoorting the great Jon Cruddas, so his membership of the groups he started is purely tokenistic and temporary).

Harman for Deputy: 2 members
Hain for Deputy: 1 member
Blears for Deputy: 15 members
Cruddas for Deputy: 22 members
Johnson for Deputy: 168 members

Labour needs a REAL contest for leader (and McDonnell is not providing it): 48 members
Gordon Brown for Prime Minister: 79 members
Stop David Cameron...his lies make Baby Jesus Cry: 306 members

BNP stuff and Civil Liberties Stuff.

2006-11-18T02:05:00.000Z

I'll start with the latter. Tom Watson has started a petition asking for the DFES to issue guidelines on the use of biometrics in schools, since none currently exist. I'll refrain from commenting on MPs who refuse to sign EDMs yet will happily start and/or sign other petitions, partly because I don't know if Tom falls into this category (he does according to TheyWrkForYou) and partly because I think the cause is more important. I also find the petitions development an interesting one - I'm going to write on this later. I wanted to start one myself, but then realised how difficult it would be to state what the petitoin was about. I don't like the idea of people starting petitions calling for PR but not mentioning which form of PR they favour, and want a petition asking for a clear investigation and, in the case of a referendum, something more substantive than a simple yes/no choice for PR.

Secondly, I want to remind you all about this:

Anti-BNP Day of Action
Barking & Dagenham
Saturday 18 November
10.30am

Labour Hall, Tenterden Road (corner of Green Lane), Dagenham

The BNP is making Barking & Dagenham its national priority. As a result, the local Labour Party and Barking & Dagenham Together are holding the first of a series of Days of Action to take the fight against the extremists into the community.

We urge everyone to spare a couple of hours to come and help defeat the BNP in East London

And, owing to tiredness and the time I am posting, my apologies to The Pamphleteer for shamelessly copying and pasting of tht information from his/her site. But I reiterate everything that it says. We really need your help.

The Day of Action is going on all day, so if you can't make 10.30am, please do come along later in the day.

Disgraced MP and EU Fiasco.

2006-11-17T10:14:00.000Z

I do love checking BBC News of a morning. Especially on day's like today. Tom Watson managed to beat me to commenting on the sad passing of a legendary footballer, although I may leave comment on his site later. Tom must have been in a rush when news-checking though, since he missed two interesting bits of gossip/information.

First,John Gray MP seems to be in a bit of a mess. He's blaming his imminent deselection as Conservative candidate on the fact that he is currently going through a divorce, something which he feels should not reflect upon his abilities as an MP. However, he conveniently neglects to mention that the instigation of the divorce was the affair he had while his wife was receiving treatment for cancer. It seems that poor Mr. Gray is not the exemplar of Opus Dave's compassionate Conservatism. Or maybe its just that even Tories find that some things are just plain bad taste, and that a guy who could cheat on his cancer-stricken wife is not the kind of guy you can trust to represent you in parliament. Either way, he's "hopeful" of winning the postal ballot of local Tories.

Just as hopeful as MPs are about the idea that we constitutionally have parliamentary sovereignty. MPs seem to think that if our veto powers on EU crime laws are removed, this would be lost. But, legally and constitutionally speaking, it has already been sequestered. One need only look so far as the Human Rights Act (2000) for evidence of this. I'm fully expecting some posts disagreeing with this point, so let me clarify. What I'm trying to say is that we don't have de jure parliamentary sovereignty anymore; it is this that our involvement in the EU has removed. I am not going to offer a value judgement upon this state of affairs (at least not for the time being, anyway). That said, I think that a case could be made for saying that we have had de facto sovereignty (although I know an Oxford Professor of Government who would utterly disagree with even this, more restricted opinion). I'm going to post more on this later, but I think we do need to consider whether removing the veto on crime legislation would alter de facto sovereignty (if, that is, we accept that we still possess it) and not get into debates about de jure sovereignty which has already been affected.

Say NO to HMO Quotas!

2006-11-17T00:29:00.000Z

That is the name of this( http://oxford.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2217874507&ref=mf ) facebook group. And below, you will find some information regarding this idea (copied and pasted from the link page).

Students tend to live with their friends in order to save money. Now 2 MSPs want to restrict how many people can do this in 1 area - raising the cost of living as a student. This abhorrent amendment to the planning bill will be debated this week. Don't let them socially engineer students out of affordable housing. Join the campaign. Say NO to HMO quotas.

Background:

A large proportion of Edinburgh University students live in privately rented flats with a Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) license. The HMO license is a statutory requirement for all rented properties housing three or more tenants and was originally developed to ensure minimum safety standards.

For a number of years, private housing associations and local residents in areas where large numbers of students live, such as the Marchmont area, have fought for the introduction of quotas on the number of HMO licensed properties in a particular neighbourhood, in an attempt to curb the number of students living in certain parts of the city. Residents complain about noise, litter and the affect on local amenities with students often getting blame they don't deserve.

The Problem:

Last week Glasgow MSP Pauline McNeil lodged an amendment to the Planning (Scotland) Bill which could see the number of HMO properties reduced in Edinburgh and other university cities such as Glasgow and Aberdeen. If this amendment passes it could cause huge problems for affordable student housing.

We are concerned that these amendments will have a markedly negative effect on the provision of affordable housing in the local area. This will especially affect students who are the most common occupants of HMO licensed properties and cannot afford to pay more in rent. Furthermore, allowing local authorities to set quotas by street, and therefore reject HMOs up for renewal, will displace student communities. Consequently there would be increased marketisation of properties close to campuses, potentially resulting in the reality that only rich students could afford to rent property close to campus. Poorer students would be dispersed outwards, resulting in increased transport costs and perhaps even exclusion from critical aspects of the student experience.

In addition there is the principled point that it's fundamentally wrong to use HMO legislation, designed to improve the quality and safety of rented property, for the purpose of socially engineering communities.

How to do your bit:

Join our campaign and make sure that MSPs know the disastrous effect that HMO quotas will have on Scotland's students. (http://ed.facebook.com/group.php?gid=221
...

Visit the following website to send your MSP a letter or email: http://www.nusonline.co.uk/scotland/Camp
...

Cheers,

Tom

SOME COMMENTS FROM THE KIDS ON THE GROUND:

Post #1
1 reply
J***** B*** (St Andrews) wrote on Nov 12, 2006 at 11:16 AM
What is the logic behind such an amendment?
Reply to Jhonti
Send Message
Report Jhonti

Post #2
B*** A**** (Edinburgh) replied to Jhonti's post on Nov 12, 2006 at 11:19 AM
it because there has been complaints from non-student residents in areas largely populated by students - mainly its the grey vote this politicians are going for.
So areas such as Marchmont will be hit hard by it. OF course, what these people fail to realise that its students that drive the economy of these areas. Using the example of Marchmont, if it wasnt for the students in that area then the local grocers wouldnt have exist and the number of convenience stores would halve, and the local hairdressers would go out of buisness and the local pubs would close and, and, and .......
Reply to Beth
Send Message
Report Beth

Post #3
L*** B***** (Edinburgh) wrote on Nov 13, 2006 at 9:24 AM
This make no sense - if people are comlaining about students in their area, surely it makes to to put all the students in the same area so that theres no one else living there to get annoyed by them.

SAMPLE LETTER:
13th November 2006

Dear Mike Pringle MSP/Mark Ballard MSP/Colin Fox MSP/Fiona Hyslop MSP/Robin Harper MSP/Margo Macdonald MSP/ Lord James Douglas-Hamilton MSP

Re: Amendments to the Planning Bill

I am a student at Edinburgh University and I’m writing to make you aware of my concerns regarding Stage Three amendments to the Planning Bill, being debated and voted on this Thursday. One tabled amendment requires all landlords to have planning consent as well as an HMO license in order to operate an HMO licensed property. Another amendment creates a provision for local authorities to limit the number of HMO properties operating within any given stairwell or street.

I am concerned that these amendments will have a markedly negative effect on the provision of affordable housing in my local area. This will especially affect students such as myself who are the most common occupants of HMO licensed properties and cannot afford to pay more in rent. Furthermore, allowing local authorities to set quotas by street and therefore reject HMOs up for renewal could displace student communities in Edinburgh and other university cities like Aberdeen, Dundee and Glasgow. Consequently, there would be increased marketisation of properties close to campuses, potentially resulting in the reality that only rich students could afford to rent property close to campus. Poorer students would be dispersed outwards, resulting in increased transport costs and perhaps even exclusion from critical aspects of the student experience.

In addition there is the principled point that it’s fundamentally wrong to use HMO legislation, designed to improve the quality and safety of rented property, for the purposes of socially engineering communities.

I hope you agree with the sentiments in this letter and vote against these amendments when they come before Parliament on Thursday.

Yours Sincerely,

Name:

Address:

Sion Simon MP Goes Hip Hop

2006-11-16T21:35:00.000Z

Well, with the publicity that his infamous satire got, it was only a matter of time before this appeared, wasn't it?

Healthy Eating Is Bad For You

2006-11-16T18:24:00.000Z

At least it can be, according to this article. Jamie Oliver should be arrested for child abuse. Maybe.

I honestly don't really think about what I eat in terms of how healthy it is. I like good food - which is why being broke sucks, since I have to get the cheap varieties of food or cut out some of my favourites. I think my diet is generally healthyish, its hard not to be when you grew up with organic vegetables gowing in the back garden and two allotments. But I dont actively cook meals with their healthyness in mind. And I tend to counteract the positives with tons of salt and cheese anyway.

With all the discussion of obesity, anorexia, orthorexia and so on, I'm starting to feel a bit left out not having an eating/food-based health problem.

Mode II

2006-11-16T02:11:00.000Z

Genius Spray Paint Artist.

Credit Where Its Due - Yes Tony, That Means You.

2006-11-16T01:45:00.000Z

Seems he did good today. I seldom say such things. I'll praise aspects of the Blair governments, but my praise for the man himself is as scarce as Liverpool away wins this season. On Tony, I am usually found to be more in agreement with the words of several who at University with him; I can't believe somebody so incompetent is running the country.

Nevertheless, he did do this.

Thanks for that Tony.

Style

2006-11-16T01:27:00.000Z

A brief break from politics (and a brief break from my bloody ongoing and neverending pile of work), to bring you.....

Style.

Class.

Elegance.

For ties, cufflinks and hankerchiefs. Let's face it they do it best. And with customers like they have, they should do.
http://www.edeandravenscroft.co.uk/
My particular favourite is their selection of silk paisley ties. Divine.

For watches: http://www.daviddugganwatches.co.uk/

For suits: http://www.ozwaldboateng.co.uk/

I'll accept some sharper dressed men around portcullis greenhouse as my thanks.

Comparative Analysis (Labour/Conservatives)

2006-11-15T22:34:00.000Z

Here's something of interest

Group:
Everybody hates Labour (especially Tony Blair!)
Network:
Global
Size:
5 members
Type:
Organizations - Political Organizations

Group:
Everybody Hates Labour
Network:
Global
Size:
43 members
Type:
Common Interest - Religion & Spirituality

Group:
Everybody Hates Tories
Network:
Global
Size:
423 members
Type:
Common Interest - Religion & Spirituality

After many hours of painstaking research (thanks are here owed to the ESRC who funded a sabbatical in which I undertook this research), I can present some conclusions.......

Everybody hates the Tories.

Okay, so that may not be entirely true. 'Tis the problem of using facebook groups as your research sample, I'm afraid (though I do think the other stuff I've posted is a little more interesting/useful in that respect). However, if this is anything to go by, I'm going to place a bet now on the next general election results..........

Oh, and I have figured out why the Alan Johnson group is disproportionately bigger than the others. It has something to do with a link to it featuring on a disproportionate amount of other groups (i.e. all of them, and not just the labour or politics ones either). Having attempted to restore some balance, we shall see if the situation changes.

Labour Elections Facebook Update.

2006-11-15T21:55:00.000Z

Due to sloth (and the fact that I am still working at this late hour), I'm just updating the three main groups today.

Cruddas 21
Johnson 149
Blears 15

Some of the "support" for Johnson is misleading, however - this is actually more a group to discuss the deputy electins generally than a specific johnson supporter group (although there are plenty within the group), as this excerpt (copy and pasted) from the Johnson for Deputy wall indicates (names inventively altered to protect privacy):

C**** G***** (Nottingham) wrote
at 5:24pm on November 12th, 2006
Go Johnson! Anyone but Harriet Harmon...
Message - Report

S** C****** (LSE) wrote
at 3:01pm on November 12th, 2006
we need a deputy who didn't vote for Iraq or ignore lebanon, almost the whole cabinet is tarnished. Some one like John Denham would restore some balance, or Kim Howells maybe
Message - Report

F***** G**** D* F****** (UCL) wrote
at 12:16pm on November 12th, 2006
I think that it is far too early to decide who the best candidate is to be the deputy leader. Why have we discounted Hilary Benn? Harriet Harman too.. I was not convinced by AJ at Stoke Rochford.Why not keep an open mind and evaluate each candidate objectively without being sucked into partisan debate concerning one`s past employment..Johnson may have been a postman and trade unionist but surely in this day and age other things matter..I like to think that the electorate and Labour party members are a little more complex and not so easily pleased.I want a deputy leader/PM who can effectively convey our numerous success stories to the electorate but also be honest with us over our failings as a government and provide us with ideas as to how to correct the mistakes that have been made,(we have not had 9years of unbridled success,esp in the realm of foreign policy.)
Lets keep and open mind and see who comes up with the best ideas to lead us into a 4th term.
Message - Report

Anti-BNP Day of Action in Barking and Dagenham.

2006-11-15T13:26:00.000Z

Okay, I know a bunch of people have heard about this and may be attending/need further details. Here is the information I have:

Jon Cruddas MP is organising a Day of Action aginst the BNP in Barking and Dagenham for Saturday 18 November 2006.

The day will begin at 10.30am at the Labour Hall, Tenterden Road, Dagenham. More details are available at www.stopthebnp.com.

I know a few people have said they can make it - but we need as many people as possible to turn out. You needn't support Jon's campaign for Labour Deputy - this day isn't part of that campaign; it is about preventing the BNP from making further headway in an area where they already have 12 councillors. And you do get the afternoon/evening to hang out in London as well as the opportunity to meet feloow Labour supporters and anti-BNP people.

If you need any more information, email me at scrybe_84@hotmail.co.uk and I shall endeavour to provide the requisite info. Post on here if you're going to be there/ might be there - it would be great to know which bloggers are going to be present and have some idea of turnout. For the record, I am not working for Jon Cruddas - I am just promoting this one because I feel its worth it. I'd be doing it even if I wasn't supporting his deputy campaign (its just that my support for his campaign led to me finding out about this day).

Hope to see as many of you as possible down there.

Conniving Cameron.

2006-11-15T12:24:00.000Z

Anyone else notice how, on the way to and from the Lords, he kept trying to be pally with Tony Blair? Also notice how Tony was trying not to respond? I was watching sans sound, and Cameron just looked like a conniving jerk who was more interested manipulating the ceremony than actually taking part in it.

Perhaps I'm biased - matriculation was an important part of my university life. And as much as we all thought it naff at the time, we quickly (i.e. during the ceremony) felt it to be something much more, something which united each and every member of our university. I feel the same way about the Queen's Speech (at least the ritualistic aspect of it). To try to use a long honoured civic ritual for personal gain goes against being British. Clearly, he isn't a one nation Tory, and nore is this one Tory's nation.

Facebook Labour leadership and deputy leadership updates to follow this evening. Along with other assorted stuff.

Reasons to Keep the Lords (1)

2006-11-15T12:20:00.000Z

They are kewl. I could give many intelligent reasons - and I have, elsewhere - but the fact is, the ceremony is brilliant. And it wouldn't be the same if the Lords were/was not the Lords. You couldn't have the robes, and the pomp, and the ritual with a Senate or a Chamber of Deputies. It would, quite frankly, be rubbish. Played out. Analogous to a boy band reuniting after a 20 year split.

I'm not saying they shouldn't be elected. In fact, I've argued elsewhere that they should be. But they must remain the Lords.

I also fail to see any reason to erase such a symbollic aspect of our culture only to rename and rebrand it as Lords-lite. Whish is what a Senate (or any other name) would be.

On this, the dear Bard was wrong (okay, I know he was writing about roses and love, but there is patriotic love in this) - The Lords by any other name would not be as sweet.

Facebook/Labour thing.

2006-11-14T23:10:00.000Z

How many people are interested in my updates of this? I'm thinking of either

(a) moving it to another blog, for easy reference if it has sufficient popularity

(b) posting fortnightly/monthly downloadable digests of what has happened in the labour leadership/deputy race as far as facebook is concerned (hopefully with reference to outside media, if someone's willing to help me)

(c) reducing the updates to twice weekly and/or when something major happens. again, help re notification of any major press releases would be useful in this. (I'm interested to see how the groups' popularities respond to positive/negative media coverage of the candidates).

Your thoughts would be welcome. Thanks.

*1*

Further Facebook/Labour Update.

2006-11-14T21:03:00.000Z

Having painstaking cross-referenced names in the two Jon Cruddas groups, I can now give you the official update for today.

Jon Cruddas: 23 members
Hazel Blears: 15
Alan Johnson: 119 (HOW? HTF DID THAT HAPPEN??)

I'm Voting Labour in 2007: 86
Gordon Brown for Prime Minister: 79
Prime Minister's Questions: 317
The Bevanites: 15
Tony Blair is a National Hero: 10

I've got to work now, but hopefully I will update again later, with the membership numbers for such illustrious groups as "Margaret Thatcher Appreciation Society" "Death to Margaret Thatcher Society" and the respective Labour and Conservative groups. This may take a little time, since some groups may differ in their "joining requirements" (i.e. they may limited to certain universities, or require the creator to okay people's applications).

I can, at this stage report that there is a sizable David Cameron support group, and the members cite reasons for their support, such as "I think he's HOT." Now, that's what happens when you ignore Bevan's call for a totally free NHS and start introducing fees for glasses, amongst other things.

Detention tactics.

2006-11-14T19:39:00.000Z

It was brought to my attention yesterday that one of the science teachers in my old school would force students who had been put on detention to watch "The Birth" video in reverse as punishment because it was the most disgusting and cruel thing they could think of to punish misbehaviour. Gross. Perhaps said teacher could find employment in the U.S. military interrogation departments.

Update of Labour elections.

2006-11-14T16:19:00.000Z

Here's how facebook are calling it so far:

Cruddas 4 Deputy (group 1) : 15 members
Cruddas for deputy (group 2) : 11 members
Johnson for deputy : 114 members
Blears for deputy : 16 members

I'm voting Labour in 2007 : 86 members
Brown for Prime Minister : 78 members
Tony Blair is a National Hero : 10 members

So, alan johnson seems pretty popular then. But looking at the members list, I can see quite a few paid up tories supporting him, so I wonder how this will translate in the real world.

If I'm not mistaken, support for Hazel Blears has haemorrhaged, while the two Cruddas groups, taken together would give a misleading score of 26 since some people are members of both goups. Therefore, we shall settle with the conservative figure of 22 for Cruddas.

The other potential candidates are still unpopular to have their own goup. Although Jack Straw does have the support of 48 people over his veil comments. You really don't want to read some of the posts about that.

(If anybody can do screen grabs of the facebook site - I wouldn't say no to the group pages for any of the above).

Quotables...

2006-11-14T00:13:00.000Z

Just returned from evening engagement with friend I haven't seen in 3 years and a huge cru of hers. I'm going to report the conclusions and quotables of the night ( may post more later).

Conclusions
(1) Apparently I've turned posh. According to aforementioned friend. Since attedngint he uni she is currently applying to. Apparently it is because of attending the uni she is currently applying to.
(2) I'm not the only one having an "interesting" time in westminster. If you know what I mean, you know what I mean.
(3) My mate has not gronw at all in the three years I've not seen her. I called her "diminutive" - she took this use of "big words" as further evidence of conclusion (1).
(4) The Red Lion allows you to pull your own pints of snakebite.
(5) You can go to major fesitvals and lounge in the VIP seciton if you masquerade as the MP you work for. I am booking my sex-change operation as we speak.
(6) I can get absolutely legless and not give away any secrets (or things that have not been officially decreed as "secrets" but, nonetheless, by my judgement, should not be discussed with others).
(7) I can get absolutely legless and not have altercations with random metal sidewalk things (y'know those railings they put in the only crossable bits of most LDN streets). Unlike one of my friends (yes, H O-A, that does mean you, lol).
(8) I can get absolutely legless and still spell correctly and write a readable (although possibly uninteresting) blog. At least, I think I can. Gawd, do I feeel like that train engine. Do correct me if this conclusion is wrong.

And now........

THE QUOTABLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My friend, explaining her breakup with the guy she was seeing when I last saw her : "Yeah, well.......I tried telling him six years ago that I was a dyke, but he just wouldn't listen."

From pretty much everyone tonight : "I f***ing hate my internship!!!" and "I never see my MP!!!!!!!!!"

From me : "I never see my MP AND everybody I speak to thinks my research project is impossible to do in the time I've been given. I even have ex-tutors saying they couldn't do what I've been asked to do - and THEY TAUGHT ME FOR THREE YEARS!!!!!!!!!'

Someone who should have been working with someone else I know : "NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dont send that text!!!!!! AAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! Now he's going to think I'm really bitter and hate him and I don't...."

My response : "It's okay - he'll be kewl. Besides, judging from the swift response to the last text, a wind up reply would be the requisite response from me."

(If you get the reference for that one, you should have done. If you didn't you weren't supposed to.)

From a text message just received frm my mate : "aah....I knew you liked him."

My response : "Meh. I is ghetto, I dont do liking." note: this is in reference to someone we met tonight, if you weren't there then it wasn't you. And yeah, I is ghetto. And no, I don't do liking. But he was kinda, um, yeah.).

From a random person who accosted me upon leaving the tube station : "Eh, drugs, would you like somee? Buy? Buy them - only £20" They were offering me a bag of sealed Maom (or w/e its called) sweets.

Updates of facebook/labour thing tomorrow am - promise! But I will now affirm that I found out today that there are two (YES 2!!!!!!!!!!) groups for JON CRUDDASS!!!!!!!!!!!!! Each has ten members, so the toalt below should be 20 for Jon Cruddass, not 9 as originally reported. Full update by noon tuesday.

Update

2006-11-13T18:18:00.001Z

Okay, today was quite interesting - well, this afternoon was, anyway. However, I'm suffering a terrible clod/flu type diseas of the highest order and have to get to an engagement tonight, so can't post until later/and/or tomorow.

Update of today's wonderflness and of the facebook/labour elections stuff will follow shortly. (Poss. as an edit of this post, so keep ya eyes on it).

I apologise for any inconvenience.

And thanks to the people who posted below. Major props to the person who mentoned a hit counter for me.

Does Anybody Read This Blog?

2006-11-13T00:15:00.000Z

Just checking - I've only had one comment :( and I really have to get a hit counter installed. I don't want to keep posting if no one's reading.

On a different note, I shall be getting thoroughly drunk tomorrow evening (or later this evening, depending on how you see it) in the company of an old friend and one of her friends who I've been in touch with but haven't met. Friend of friend [jokingly] suggested we attempt to lick/pull members of the cabinet, shotgunning not John Prescott. Transcribed below (in quotation marks) is my ultra-diplomatic response.

"text me when you have a date for these drinks - I'm definitely good for it. re post below [by aforementioned friend of friend]: shotgun any cute ones......

hahaha, as if there are any!

(my MP, should [they] read this, is, of course, preternaturally beautiful (in a totally non-sexual manner you understand) like a da vinci sketch or greek sculpture; but my penchant for dionysian imperfections precludes any interest in [their] apollonian aesthete)."

I kid you not. I have skills. Super-diplomatic skills. I'm a political ninja. And, as you may guess from the state of this post, I am a copious-amounts-of-bombay-sapphire-drinking political ninja. There really should be a breathelizer security feature for computers/the internet.

Find The Lord.....

2006-11-12T22:01:00.000Z

who shares your birthday! I have three:

Lord Lyell - Conservative
Lord Plumb - Conservative
Lord Lyell of Markyate - Conservative

but I think the two Lord Lyells are, in fact, one and the same person. This is the new addition to the WriteToThem website, and it allows you to select a Lord by place (e.g. they are from that place, or went to uni there), by topic interest, or by birthday. You can also choose a Random Lord - I got Lord Mance (a crossbencher). A brief moment of amusement.

But a little worrying that I share birthdays with a bunch of Tories. Oh well, I'm a day away from sharing a birthday with Neil Kinnock, and my heritage is partly from a constituency which neighboured his and for which he almost stood.

Facebook Calls Labour Contest!

2006-11-12T17:34:00.000Z

Okay, a few days ago I posted on "Facebook calling the recent U.S. elections." And following a conversation with a friend who was considering backing Cruddas for the Labour Deputy post, I changed my "status" on facebook to "I am supporting JON CRUDDAS FOR LABOUR DEPUTY." Within a couple of hours, another friend, Jack, invited me to join his group "Jon Cruddas for Deputy!" This got me thinking, and having now researched the facebook groups, my findings on the Labour Leadership and Deupty Leadership contests can be found below. Unfortunately, the groups do not have informatioin on when they were founded, which makes the membership numbers difficult to assess (I know the Cruddas one was only started yesterday, while others have been around longer). I'll try to keep this updated as the contest progresses.

The Labour Leadership/Deputy Leadership race as of 5.25pm, Sunday 12th November, 2006:
(Format= Group: Membership numbers)

Hazel Blears for Deputy: 14 members
Alan Johnson for Deputy: 32 members
Jon Cruddas for Deputy: 9 members

Brown for Prime Minister: 78 members
Labour needs a REAL contest for leader: 48 members
I'm voting Labour in 2007: 85 members

McDonnell, Hain, Harman, Reid, and everyone else has evdiently failed to galvanise the youth vote, since they have no support groups. Though perhaps with this lack of support, they are the potential candidates who would most benefit from a support group. In every sense of the term.

Is A Brown Coalition An Orange One?

2006-11-12T16:58:00.000Z

According to Jasper Gerard in CiF, Gordon Brown is courting the LibDems in the case of a hung parliament. And he is not averse to the idea of electoral reform, either. Gerard thinks Gordon wants to being his Prime Ministership in similar style to his start as Chancellor, with "fireworks" (so, we can take it a November election is on, then, lol), distancing himself from Blair as he does so. And what better way to achieve this than by changing the electoral system?

However, the problem with this (or one problem, of many) that I have pointed out repeatedly elsewhere, is that a change in the electoral system for the House of Commons could have a significant impact on what can be done to reform the upper house, the Lords. I've always found it amusing (in a slightly despairing way) that proponents of Commons electoral reform are often those who also favour an elected Lords. The problem with this is that if PR is introduced to the Commons, what system is used to elect the Lords?

(1) We can use the same system in both houses. This was Italy's style. It didn't work there. We'd end up with a duplication of houses, in terms of their composition, and the purpose of the Lords would be called into question since it would just delay the introduction of legislation, rather than amending it.

(2) We can abolish the Lords. Great way to increase the power of the Government vis a vis other political actors.

(3) We can have a system like STV (single transferable vote) in the Commons and full PR in the Lords (party list). Great. That way we can have a Lords with no independents and strong party control. Just what we wanted to achieve. Again, hardly likely to result in power being decentralised.

(4) We can use a system like AV+ or MMP in the Commons, with STV in the Lords. The flaws in this plan could be written about at great length (and they have - but Alan Johnsons seems not to have read any of it). Suffice it to say that there are strong reasons why this is a very very very stupid idea. AV+ is even dumber than MMP (I honestly think that anyone involved in designing AV+ should have their intelligence tested and their degrees and other qualifications revoked, since this idea demonstrates that they probably only obtained such qualifications through deception).

Oh. Dear.

Gordon, ask me for a copy of "Constituting the Constitution." You might find it useful.

Facebook Called U.S. Elections...

2006-11-09T19:57:00.000Z

The recent U.S. elections were interesting. Aside from the actual race itself, I found what happened over at facebook very interesting. Facebook is like myspace, only it was, until recently, only open to university students and some schools. In the run up to the election, candidates had pages on the site to which users could link as "supporters" (rather thhan as "friends" as normally happens on the site), and there were Issues to which users copuld declare an interest in.

Given that each time you log in, the first page you see is a news feed of what your friends have recently done, one person with 300 friends (not that unusual on there) signing up to a candidate automatically generates a nice amount of free publicity for that candidate in a form that the candidate themselves could not possibly hope to do. It also allows candidates to post notes, and for supporters to post on their "wall" (again, like myspace). I wonder what effect this had on the race overall. I think the very fact that it being documented on the site increased the interest in the race among young people, even those who are not from the U.S. and had little interest in American electoral politics before (I'm calling this last bit on the basis of many of my friends).

But, even more interesting was the election pulse, which registered the support of the various candidates in each race, a kind of continuous online poll, if you will. When the votes were being counted, the vote share actually received was shown alongside the support-share on facebook. How I wish I'd had the forethought to look at this before the actual race, and how I wish the data was also available in its raw form (i.e. not simply as percentages), since it would have been a fascinating source for some electoral analysis.

Gardening Gansta-style.

2006-11-09T19:50:00.000Z

I came across this in the london paper on my tube ride home today. Guerrilla gardening is an excellent idea, in my opinion, I'm glad that they're doing it. I must confess to my amusement over the fact that they have been stopped by the police on occasion (although the cops do tend to take a positive view of what is being done), and the fact that, technically, doing free gardening to run-down public spaces is illegal.

Perhaps, if the argument that other illegal activities sometimes find popularity among the youth due to their very illegality (e.g. graffiti) holds, young people could be encouraged to garden by stealth?

lol

ThaLondonDiaries

Update!!! Change Your Blogrolls!!!

Personality Cluster

Comment of 2007

Update of Paul Delaire Staines

Paul Delaire Staines.

Barak Obama

Intelligent Post Alert!

Scrybe's Absence...Explained.

If Music be the Food of Love...

Thatcherite Air Rage.

CRE Christmas Card

First Post From A New Job.

Blackberry help needed!

Scrybe's Job-Related Happy Bunnyness Cont....

Scrybe Doing a Time Magazine Article.

Blogroll Update!

Cameron gets a Good Fisking.

Unite and lead? I'd bet on Jon. (Cruddas Conference Call)

Ow. My Head.

Books I Do Own (1)

Cruddas Conference Call.

Cruddas Conference Call.

What Do You Want To Ask Jon Cruddas? Urgent.

Phallically Shaped Objects - Just For El Tom.

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (5)

Clever Housing.

Alan Rickman Supports Labour.

Weird.

Books I Wish I Owned (1)

The Happy Bunnyness of a Certain Scrybe Revealed. Fully.

Scrybe's Happy Bunnynes Explained (1)

Pick of the Petitions. (1)

Must Be The Winter Weather...

Required Reading (1).

Trevor Phillips U-Turn.

Blogroll Update!

2006 Racial Equality Awards.

Jon Cruddas on the Phone... Web Exclusive.

Blogging and Campaigning: Notice Board. MUST READ!!

One of Those Days...

BREAKING NEWS: EXPOSE OF NEWERLABOUR

Petition to End Women's Suffrage.

I'm More Democrat Than Republican.

Labour Organising The Internet (Pls Read This!!!).

Fight the BNP

Shortest Political Test.

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (4)

John McDonnell Speaks On Scrybe.....

Stupid Questions (1)

On the Happy Bunniness of a Certain Scrybe.

My Pre-Review of Tonight's Progress Event and The New Beta Blogger

Prime Minister to Speak.

Scrybe is a Happy Bunny.

Deputy Candidate Faces Inquiry.

Tentative Support for MP's Pay Rise Claims.

Wine, and other tippling overs....

The Problem with Trying to buy Essential in December...

Forthcoming Posts.

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (3) and My Support for Cruddas

The Joys of Academia!

Labour Facebook : We Have Been Noticed.

Absolute Idiots (1): Nigel Griffith.

On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Hats

Info For Local Councillors and "Community Leader" Type Folk.

Scrybe's London Diaries White Paper

Christmas scam - Watch Out.

Labour Deputy Election Facebook Update (2)

Creative Learning.

Labour Deputy Elections Facebook Update

Select Committees Linked With Depressive Disorders!!

Scrybe's Night Out

Englishness, Britishness, and A Time-wasting Device For People Like Me.

Adam's Ricketts.

Bloggger's Comments Award (1).

Facebook Labour Leader and Deputy Elections Update

BNP stuff and Civil Liberties Stuff.

Disgraced MP and EU Fiasco.

Say NO to HMO Quotas!

Sion Simon MP Goes Hip Hop